اثر استفاده از کاه لوبیای چیتی فرآوری شده در جیره بر عملکرد رشد بره های پرواری فراهانی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

بخش تحقیقات علوم دامی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان مرکزی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، اراک، ایران

چکیده

این پروژه به­منظور بررسی اثر استفاده از کاه لوبیای فرآوری شده در جیره بر صفات رشد و پروار بره­های توده فراهانی انجام شد. سیلاژ کاه لوبیا با افزودن 3 درصد اوره تهیه شد. یک ماه بعد از تهیه سیلاژ، میزان ماده خشک، عصاره اتری، خاکستر، پروتئین خام و الیاف نامحلول در شوینده اسیدی و خنثی کاه لوبیای فرآوری شده اندازه­گیری شد. گوارش‌پذیری آزمایشگاهی سیلاژها با روش آزمون گاز اندازه‌گیری شد. در مرحله بعد، 45 رأس بره 5-4 ماهه (با میانگین وزن برابر با 29/22 کیلوگرم) به سه گروه تقسیم شده و به جیره‌های آزمایشی اختصاص یافتند. جیره‌های آزمایشی شامل: 1- جیره شاهد، 2- جیره دارای کاه لوبیای فرآوری نشده و 3- جیره دارای کاه لوبیای فرآوری شده با اوره بودند. فرآوری کاه لوبیا با اوره، باعث افزایش پروتئین خام از 8 درصد به 1/12 درصد شد (01/0P<). آمونیاکی کردن کاه لوبیا سبب کاهش مقدار الیاف نامحلول در شوینده خنثی و اسیدی و افزایش گوارش­پذیری ماده خشک و ماده آلی آن شد (01/0P<). افزایش وزن روزانه بره­های گروه کاه لوبیای فرآوری شده، بیشتر از بره­های دو گروه دیگر، و ضریب تبدیل غذایی نیز در بره­های گروه کاه لوبیای فرآوری شده، بهبود نشان داد (01/0P<). استفاده از کاه لوبیا و کاه لوبیای فرآوری شده با اوره در جیره غذایی بره­ها سبب کاهش هزینه تغذیه به­ازای هر کیلوگرم اضافه وزن بره­­ها نسبت به بره­های گروه شاهد شد. در مجموع، آمونیاکی کردن کاه لوبیا با کود اوره، روشی ساده و مؤثر برای فرآوری و افزایش ارزش غذایی این پس­ماند است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of using processed pinto bean straw in the diet on the growth performance of Farahani fattening lambs

نویسنده [English]

  • A. Mirshamsollahi
Agriculture and Natural Resources Research Center of Markazi Province, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Arak, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Livestock nutrition represents a significant portion of the total costs in animal husbandry. To enhance efficiency, identifying inexpensive feed sources is a key strategy. The gap between the demand and supply of feed ingredients has notably widened in recent decades, and livestock producers are facing numerous challenges in obtaining feed resources due to drought and rising prices of conventional feedstuffs. Consequently, there is an increasing need to utilize affordable alternative feed materials in ruminant diets. Processing and effectively using agricultural by-products and residues as feed for ruminants is essential for improving livestock production. Legume straws, particularly bean straw, have gained attention both domestically and internationally as an important and economical source of roughage in ruminant nutrition. With superior nutrient composition compared to cereal straws, legume straws offer greater potential for widespread use in animal diets. In regions where beans are cultivated, the production of bean residues is significant and can fulfill part of the nutritional needs of livestock. Feeding bean straw to ruminants may offer benefits over certain cereal straws, likely due to its higher crude protein content and other valuable nutrients. From a nutritional standpoint, processed legume straws serve as sources of energy and protein in the diets of fattening livestock, helping to reduce feeding costs and improve animal performance. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of incorporating processed and unprocessed bean straw into the diets of Farahani lambs on their growth performance and fattening characteristics.
Materials and methods: Bean straw was processed with urea by ensiling in plastic covers. For every 100 kg of bean residue, 50 kg of water (50%), 3 kg of chemical urea fertilizer (3%), 1 kg of calcium carbonate (1%), and 100 g of sulfur were added. One month after ensiling, dry matter, ether extract, ash, crude protein, and acid detergent fiber and neutral detergent fiber contents of the processed bean straw were determined. In vitro digestibility of samples was also assessed using the gas test method. Subsequently, at a sheep farm in Arak County, 45 lambs aged 4–5 months with similar average weights were randomly assigned to three experimental groups: 1) wheat straw (control), 2) bean straw, and 3) urea-treated bean straw. The experiment lasted 90 days, during which lambs’ weight gain was measured every 30 days and daily dry matter intake was recorded by collecting feed refusals before morning feeding. Weight gain, feed conversion ratio (FCR) were examined monthly and over the entire fattening period. Data were analyzed using mixed model procedures in SAS software (version 9.1), and treatment means were compared by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Results and discussion: The study found that treating bean straw with urea significantly increased its crude protein content by 25.51%, elevating it from 8% in untreated straw to 12.1% in urea-treated straw (P<0.05). Ammoniation effectively reduced both neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber contents (P<0.05). Additionally, urea treatment markedly improved the dry matter and organic matter digestibility of the bean straw compared to untreated samples (P<0.05). Ammoniation also resulted in higher gas production (P<0.05) and enhanced organic matter digestibility by approximately 11%, boosting the metabolizable energy content from 7.29 to 9.1 MJ/kg DM in treated straw (P=0.01). The feeding trial indicated that incorporating bean straw increased daily feed intake compared to the control diet, with urea-treated bean straw further enhancing intake over untreated straw (P=0.03). Furthermore, lambs fed urea-treated bean straw exhibited significantly greater daily weight gain than those in the control and untreated straw groups (P=0.01), along with an improved feed conversion ratio (P=0.01). Economic analysis showed that adding bean straw and urea-treated bean straw to the lambs' diet reduced the feeding cost per kilogram of weight gain compared to the control group.
Conclusions: Ammoniating bean by-products with urea is a straightforward and effective method to enhance their nutritional value. This technique significantly increases crude protein content and digestibility, allowing these by-products to replace conventional feeds like alfalfa, corn silage, and various oilseed meals in ruminant diets. As a result, it reduces overall feed costs and lowers meat production expenses.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Urea
  • Fattening lamb
  • Fattening performance
  • Processing
  • Bean straw
Abbasinavand, Z., Seifdavati, J., Alipour Einaldin, M., Abdi-Benemar, H., Mirzaei Aghjeh Gheshlagh, F., & Seyedsharifi, R., (2024). Effect of chickpea straw silage processing with urea, molasses and cellulase enzyme on chemical composition, gas production, ruminal and intestinal digestibility. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research, 16(3), 347-365. doi: 10.22067/ijasr.2024.85302.1182 [In Persian]
Abd El-Galil, R., & Ebtehag, I. M. (2011). Role of bacterial treatments for upgrading nutritive value of bean straw and native goats performance.  Journal of American Science, 7(5), 502-510.
Agricultural Statistics. (2023). Agricultural Statistics (Crop Year 2021-2022) Volume One: Crop Products. Ministry of Jihad-e Keshavarzi, Deputy for Planning and Economic Affairs, Information and Communication Technology Center, Iran. [In Persian]
AOAC. (2005). Official Methods of Analysis. Vol. I. 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Arlington, VA.
Atta Elmnan, B. A., Fadel Elseed, A. M. A., & Salih, A. M. (2007). Effect of ammonia and urea treatments on the chemical composition and rumen degradability of bagasse. Journal of Applied Science Research, 3(11), 1359-1362.
Cui, J. H., Yang, H. J., Yu, C. Q., Bai, S., Song, S. S., Wu, T. T., Sun, W., Shao, X. M., & Jiang, L. S. (2016). Effect of urea fertilization on biomass yield, chemical composition, in vitro rumen digestibility and fermentation characteristics of straw of highland barley planted in Tibet. Journal of Agricultural Science, 154(1), 151-164. doi: 10.1017/S0021859615000805
Datt, C., & Singh, G. (1995). Effect of protein supplementation on in vitro digestibility and gas production of wheat straw. Indian Journal of Dairy Science, 48, 357-361. doi: 10.2527/jas1983.56115x
De Boever, J. L., Aerts, J. M., Vanacker, J. M., & De Brabander, D. L. (2005). Evaluation of the nutritive value of maize silages using a gas production technique. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 123, 255-265. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.12.005
Eeynipour, P., Chaji, M., & Sari, M. (2018). Determining the appropriate level for replacement of bean residues with wheat straw or corn silage in finishing diet. Animal Production Research, 7(1), 23-30. doi: 10.22124/ar.2018.9286.1272 [In Persian]
El- Raman, G. A. A., Sherif, S. Y., Sarhan, M. A., & Aboul- Ela, S. S. (1989). Evaluation of poor quality roughages treated with ammonia for feeding sheep. Proceeding of the third Egyptian British Conference on Animals, Fish, and Poultry production. Pp. 259-269.
El-Shinnawy, M., El-Ayek, M., El-Ayouty, S., & Maklad, E. H. (2001). Influence of urea treatment and supplementation of protein and energy sources on cell wall structure and its digestibility of rice or soybean straw based diets. Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 26(11), 6797-6812.
Fahmy, S. T. M., & Sundstøl, F. (1984). The effect of urea and protein supplementation on the in vitro digestibility of untreated or alkali‐treated barley straw. Zeitschrift fuer Tierphysiologie, Tierernährung und Futtermittelkunde, 52(2-3), 118-124.
Ghorbani, K., Azami Kordestani, T., & Yarahmadi, B. (2005). Nutritional evaluation of various legumes cultivated in Lorestan province. National Legumes Conference, Mashhad, Iran. [In Persian]
Ghorbani, M., Kianmehr, M. H., Arabhosseini, A., Sarlaki, E., Aghashahi, A., & Asadi Alamouti, A. (2021). Improving the nutritive value of wheat straw by applying the combined chemical-oxidation treatment in vitro for the use in ruminant nutrition. Animal Production Research, 10(4), 19-34.  doi: 10.22124/ar.2022.18644.1588. [In Persian]
Hanan, A. M. (2019). Biological and biochemical treatments to improve the nutritive values of bean straw (BS): 2- In vitro studies to evaluate the nutritive values of untreated and treated (BS). Egyptian Journal of Sheep and Goats Sciences, 14(1), 1. doi: 10.21608/ejsgs.2019.32570
McDonald, P., Edwards, R. A., Greenhalgh, J. F. D., Morgan, C. A., Sinclair, L. A., & Wilkinson, R. G. (2011). Animal Nutrition, 7th edition. Pearson.
McMeniman, N. P., Elliot, R., & Ash, A. J. (1988). Supplementation of rice straw with crop by-products. I. Legume straw supplementation. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 19(1–2), 43-53. doi: 10.1016/0377-8401(88)90053-3
Menke, K. H., Raab, L., Salewski, A., Steingass, H., Fritz, D., & Schneider, W. (1979). The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 93(1), 217-222. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600086305
Menke, K. H., & Steingass, H. (1988). Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research and Development, 28, 7-55. doi: 10.1017/S0003356100003834
Mirzaei, Sh., Borji, M., Fazaili, H., Azizi, R., & Masoudi, A. (2016). Determination of the chemical composition of bean straw and its comparison with wheat straw. 6th National Conference on Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resources, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]
Mirzaei, Sh., Fazaili, H., Borji, M., & Azizi, R. (2008). Determination of the nutritional value of bean straw in ruminant feeding. Final report of the research project. Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center of Markazi Province. Publications of the National Animal Science Research Institute, Iran. [In Persian]
NRC (National Research Council). (2007). Nutritional requirements of small ruminants. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
Qingxiang, M., & Yiqiang, X. (1993). Effects of wheat straw ammoniation and concentrate supplementation on lamb performance. Chinese Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 1.
Rodriguez-Garza, F., Zorrilla- Rios, J.M., Munoz- Navrro, C., & Arellano- Martinez, L. (1985). Effects of treatment with ammonium hydroxide and urea, moisture and treatment time on composition of bean straw. Tecnica Pecuaria en Mexico, 49, 42-49.
Saenger, P. F., Lemenager, R. P., & Hendrix, K. S. (1983). Effects of anhydrous ammonia treatment of wheat straw upon in vitro digestion, performance and intake by beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 56(1), 15-20. doi: 10.2527/jas1983.56115x
Schneider, M., & Flachowsky, G. (1990). Studies on ammonia treatment of wheat straw: Effects of level of ammonia, moisture content, treatment time and temperature on straw composition and degradation in the rumen of sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 29(3-4), 251-264. doi: 10.1016/0377-8401(90)90031-3
Shelke, R. R., Chavan, S. D., & Kahate, P. A. (2014). Effect of untreated and urea treated soybean straw on feeding value in lactating cows. The Asian Journal of Animal Science, 9(2), 212-214. doi: 10.15740/HAS/TAJAS/9.2/212-214
Shrinivasa, D. J., & Maski, D. (2017). Opportunities and Challenges for Straw Fortification for Livestock Feed: Scope for Mechanization. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science, 6(9), 1661-1670. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.609.204
Talebian Masoudi, A., & Mirshamsolahi, A. (2021). Effects of anhydrous ammonia treatment of wheat straw on fattening calves performance in Markazi province, Iran. Final report of the research-extension project. Publications of the National Animal Science Research Institute, Iran. [In Persian]
Talebian Masoudi A., & Mirshamsollahi A. (2022). Evaluation of the nutritional value of ammoniated wheat straw by anhydrous ammonia in fattening calves feeding. Research on Animal Production, 13(37), 95-104. doi: 10.52547/rap.13.37.95. [In Persian]
Talebian Masoudi, A., & Mirshamsolahi, A. (2024). Effect of wheat straw processed with ammonia on chemical composition, digestibility, gas production parameters, and performance of fattening calves. Animal Production Research, 13(1), 69-80. doi: 10.22124/AR.2024.26232.1807. [In Persian]
Tilley, J. M. A., & Terry, R. A. (1963). A two stage technique for the indigestion of forage crops. Journal of British Grassland Society, 18, 104-111. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x
Van Soest, P. J. (1994). Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. 2nd edition. Cornell University Press, USA.
Van Soest, P. J., Mascarenhas Ferreira, A., & Hartley, R. D. (1984). Chemical properties of fiber in relation to nutritive quality of ammonia-treated forages. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 10, 155-164. doi: 10.1016/0377-8401(84)90005-6
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, G. B., & Lewis, B. A. (1991). Symposium: Carbohydrate methodology, metabolism, and nutritional implications in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 3583-3597. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
Walli, T. K., Subba Rao, A., Singh, M. D. V. R., Pradhan, P. K., Singh, R. B., & Ibrahim, M. N. M. (1995). Urea treatment of straw. Wageningen UR. Retrieved from https://edepot.wur.nl/333853