Estimation of genetic trend for body weight of Shal sheep

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Former MSc. Student, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan

2 Associate Professor, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan

3 Instructor, Department of Animal Science, Qazvin’s Agricultural and Natural Resources Researches Center

Abstract

In this research genetic trends for body weight traits of Shal lambs, including: birth weight (BW), weaning weight (WW), 6-month weight (6MW), 9-month weight (9MW) and yearling weight (YW) were studied over a 16-year period. Genetic parameters were estimated using restricted maximum likelihood (REML) method under animal model and breeding values of animals were predicted with Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUP) methodology with single-trait and five-trait animal models. Genetic trends were estimated by regressing the mean of breeding values on year of birth. Direct heritability for BW, WW, 6MW, 9MW and YW were estimated 0.32, 0.47, 0.32, 0.41 and 0.28, respectively. Genetic trends for these traits from both single- and five-trait analyses were estimated (-3 and 4), (32 and 35), (-18 and 10), (27 and 28), (-3 and 11) g per year, respectively, and were non-significant (P>0.05). Also, genetic progress for these traits from both single- and five-trait analyses were calculated (1 and 118), (316 and 918), (404 and 438), (522 and 672) and (60 and 379) g in studied period, respectively. The highest genetic trend was for WW, which had the highest heritability. Despite relatively high heritability for all studied traits, insignificant genetic trends for these traits indicate an undesirable selection program in Shal sheep.

Keywords

References

عمو پشت مساری ح. 1390. برآورد پارامترهای ژنتیکی صفات رشد و تولید مثل در گوسفند نژاد شال. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد. دانشگاه گیلان. دانشکده کشاورزی. 122 ص.
Abegaz S., Van Wyk J. B. and Olivier J. J. 2005. Model comparisons and genetic and environmental parameter estimates of growth and the Kleiber ratio in Horro sheep. South African Journal of Animal Science, 35: 30-40.
Amou Posht-e Masari H., Shadparvar A. A., Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh N. and Hadi Tavatori M. H. 2013. Estimation of genetic parameters for reproductive traits in Shall shep. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 45: 1259-1263.
Meyer K. 1992. Variance components due to direct and maternal effects for growth traits in Australian beef cattle. Livestock Production Science, 31: 179-204.
Bosso N. A., Cisse M. F., van der Waaij E. H., Fall A. and van Arendonk J. A. M. 2007. Genetic and phenotypic parameters of body weight in West African Dwarf goat and Djallonke sheep. Small Ruminant Research, 67: 271–278.
Dixit S. P., Dhillon J. S. and Singh G. 2001. Genetic and non-genetic parameter estimates for growth traits of Bharat Merino lambs. Small Ruminant Research, 42: 101-104.
Dixit S. P., Singh G., Chada K. and Dhillon J. S. 2002. Estimates of genetic trends in a closed flock of Bharat Merino sheep. Indian Journal of Animal Science, 72: 462-464.
Gizaw S., Lemma S., Komen H. and Van Arendonk A. M. 2007. Estimates of genetic parameters and genetic trends for live weight and fleece traits in Menz sheep. Small Ruminant Research, 70: 145-153.
Hanford K. J., Van Vleck L. D. and Snowder G. D. 2003. Estimates of genetic parameters and genetic change for reproduction, weight and wool characteristics of Targhee sheep. Journal of Animal Science, 81: 630-640.
Hanford K. J., Van Vleck L. D. and Snowder G. D. 2005. Estimates of genetic parameters and genetic change for reproduction, weight and wool characteristics of Rambouillet sheep. Small Ruminant Research 57: 175-186.
Hanford K. J., Van Vleck L. D. and Snowder G. D. 2006. Estimates of genetic parameters and genetic trend  for reproduction, weight and wool characteristics of Polypay sheep. Livestock Production Science, 102: 72-82.
Klerk H. C. and Heydenrych H. J. 1990. BLUP analysis of genetic trends in Dohne Merino. Proceedings of the Fourth World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, vol. XV, Edinburgh, UK, 23-27. July 1990. Beef Cattle Sheep Pig Genet. Breed. Fiber Fur Meat Quality, 15: 77-80.
Kosgey L. S., Baker R. L., Udo H. M. J. and van Arendonk J. A. M. 2006. Success and failures of small ruminant breeding programmes in the tropics: a review. Small Ruminant Research, 61: 13–28.
Kovac M. and Groeneveld E. 1990.Genetic and environmental trends in German swine herdbook populations. Journal of Animal Science, 68: 3523-3535.
Meyer K. 2006. WOMBAT- A progrom for mixed model analyses by Restricted Maximum Likelihood. User Notes.Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit, Armidale, 55pp.
Mokhtari M. S. and Rashidi A. 2010. Genetic trends estimation for body weights of Kermani sheep at different ages using multivariate animal models. Small Ruminant Research, 88: 23-26.
Mrode R. A. 2005. Linear Models for the Prediction of Animal Breeding Values, 2nd edition. CAB International, 344 pp.
SAS Institute. 2003. SAS User's guide, Version 9.1. SAS Institute, Inc. Cary, NC.
Shaat I., Galal S. and Mansour H. 2004. Genetic trends for lamb weights in flocks of Egyptian Rahmani and Ossimi sheep. Small Ruminant Research, 51: 23-28.
Shrestha J. N. B., Peters H. F., Heaney D. P. and Van Vleck L. D. 1996. Genetic trends over 20 years of selection in the three synthetic Arcoots, Suffolk and Finnish Landrace sheep breeds. 1. Early growth traits. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 79: 23-34.
Van Arendonk J. A. M. and Bijma P. 2003. Factors affecting commercial application of embryo technologies in dairy cattle in Europe—a modeling approach. Theriogenology, 59: 635–649.
Wilson D. E. and Willham R. L. 1986. Within-herd phenotypic, genetic and environmental trend lines for beef cattle breeders. Journal of Animal Science, 63: 1087-1094.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics