Effect of different levels of canola meal and protease enzyme on performance, egg quality traits and nutrient digestibility in laying hens

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 MSc. Graduated, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

3 Professor, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

4 Associate Professor, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to consider different levels of canola meal (CM) and protease enzyme on performance, egg quality, nutrient digestibility, intestinal aminopeptidase activity, and relative weight of digestive organs of laying hens from 28 to 36 weeks of age. In total, 180 Hy-Line W-36 laying hens were allocated to six treatments, five replicates, and six laying hens in each replication in a factorial arrangement of 3×2 by a completely randomized design with three levels of CM (0, 7.29, and 14.59%) and two levels of protease enzyme (0 and 200 g/ton). For the entire experimental period, the productive performance of laying hens and egg quality were not affected by CM levels or protease enzyme (P>0.05). As well as, there were no significant effect of CM levels and protease enzyme on AMEn, protein, and organic matter digestibility of the diet (P>0.05). The aminopeptidase activity of the duodenum (P<0.01) and jejunum (P=0.0511) was significantly increased by 14.59% CM supplemented with protease enzyme (10.61 and 11.94 Unit/ mg of tissue, respectively). Duodenal aminopeptidase activity increased by protease enzyme supplementation (7.74 vs. 6.69 Unit/ mg of tissue) (P=0.0103). The results showed that CM can be included in laying hen diets up to 14.59% with protease enzyme without any adverse effect on productive performance, egg quality traits, and nutrient digestibility.
and in order to; used instead of "to", especially after try, come, go More (Definitions, Synonyms, Translation)

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

میرزایی گودرزی س.، برجی زاده ف.، ساکی ع.، علیپور د.، و زمانی پ. 1395. اثر سطوح کنجاله آفتابگردان و آنزیم پروتئاز بر صفات عملکردی و ریخت شناسی روده باریک در مرغ­های تخم­گذار. نشریه علوم دامی (پژوهش و سازندگی)، 111: 163-176.
Al- Saffar A. E., Attia Y. A., Mahmoud M. B., Zewell H. S. and Bovera F. 2012. Productive and reproductive performance and egg quality of laying hens fed diets containing different levels of date pits with enzyme supplementations. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 45: 327-334.
Amerah A. M., Romero L. F., Awati A. and Ravindran V. 2017. Effect of exogenous xylanase, amylase, and protease as single or combined activities on nutrient digestibility and growth performance of broilers fed corn/soy diets. Poultry Science, 96: 807-816.
AOAC. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th ed. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chemists Int., Gaithersburg, MD.
Bedford M. R. 2000. Exogenous enzyme in monogastric nutrition their current value and future benefits. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 86: 1-13.
Canola Council of Canada. 2009. Canola meal: Feed industry guide. Canadian International Grains Institute. 4th ed. Accessed Oct. 2012. http://www.canolacouncil.org.
Chaparzadeh N. and ZarandiMiandooab L. 2011. The effects of salinity on pigments content and growth of two canola (BRASSICA NAPUS) cultivars. Iranian Journal of Plant Biology, 3: 13-26.
Cowieson A. J. and Roos F. F. 2014. Bioefficacy of a mono-component protease in the diets of pigs and poultry: a meta-analysis of effect on ileal amino acid digestibility. Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition, 2(e13): 1-8.
Cowieson A. J., Singh D. N. and Adeola O. 2006. Prediction of ingredient quality and the effect of a combination of xylanase, amylase, protease and phytase in the diets of broiler chicks. 2. Energy and nutrient utilisation. British Poultry Science, 47: 490-500.
Gal-Garber O. and Uni Z. 2000. Chicken intestinal aminopeptidase: partial sequence of the gene expression and activity. Poultry Science, 79: 41-45.
Garcia M., Lazaro R., Latorre M., Gracia M. and Mateos G. G. 2008. Influence of enzyme supplementation and heat processing of barley on digestive traits and productive performance of broilers. Poultry Science, 87: 940-948.
Goldberg E. M., Donna R., Michel A. and James D. 2016. Interactions between canola meal and flaxseed oil in the diets of White Lohmann hens on fatty acid profile and sensory characteristics of table eggs. Poultry Science, 95: 1805-1812.
Gopinger E., Xavier E. G., Elias M. C., Catalan A. A. S., Castro M. L. S., Nunes A. P. and Roll V. F. B. 2014. The effect of different dietary levels of canola meal on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and gut morphology of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 93: 1130-1136.
Hahn-Didde D. and Purdum S. E. 2014. The effects of an enzyme complex in moderate and low nutrient dense diets with dried distillers grains with solubles in laying hens. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 23: 23-33.
Haugh R. R. 1937. The Haugh unit for measuring egg quality. The U. S. Egg and Poultry Magazine, 43: 522-555.
Hong K. J., Lee C. H. and Kim S. W. 2004. Aspergillus oryzae GB-107 fermentation improves nutritional quality of food soybeans and feed soybean meals. Journal of Medicinal Food, 7: 430-435.
Hy-Line International. 2015. Hy-Line W-36 Commercial Management Guide, 2015. Hy-Line Int., West Des Moines, IA, USA.
Ikegami S., Tsuchihashi F., Harada H., Tsuchihashi N., Nishide E. and Innami S. 1990. Effect of viscous indigestible polysaccharides on pancreatic biliary secretion and digestive organs in rats. Journal of Nutrition, 120: 353-360.
Kalmendal R. and Tauson R. 2012. Effects of a xylanase and protease, individually or in combination, and an ionophore coccidiostat on performance, nutrient utilization, and intestinal morphology in broiler chickens fed a wheat- soybean meal- based diet. Poultry Science, 91: 1387-1393.
Karimzadeh S., Rezaei M. and Teimouri A. 2016. Effects of canola bioactive peptides on performance, digestive enzyme activities, nutrient digestibility, intestinal morphology and gut microflora in broiler chicken. Poultry Science, 4: 27-36.
Khajali F. and Slominski B. A. 2012. Factors that affect the nutritive value of canola meal for poultry. Poultry Science, 91: 2564-2575.
Kocher A., Choct M., Porter M. D. and Broz J. 2000. The effects of enzyme addition to broiler diets containing high levels of canola or sunflower meal. Poultry Science, 79: 1936-1942.
Lemme A., Ravindran V. and Bryden W. L. 2004. Ileal digestibility of amino acids in feed ingredients for broilers. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 60: 423-438.
Ludovic L., Kathleen S., Derek D. and Jean-Christophe B. 2015. Benefits of protease addition on top of a commercial young laying hen diet. In: Proceeding of 104th Poultry Science Association Annual Meeting, 27-30 July. Kentucky, pp. 87-90.
Manyeula F., Mlambo V., Marume U. and Sebola N. A. 2020. Partial replacement of soybean products with canola meal in indigenous chicken diets: size of internal organs, carcass characteristics and breast meat quality. Poultry Science, 99: 256-262.
Mirzaie goudarzi S., Saki A. A., Mohamamdi N. and Zamani P. 2017. The effect of substitution of soybean with canola meal in laying hens diet formulated on the basis of total or digestible amino acids on performance and blood parameters. Journal of Livestock Science and Technologies, 5: 1-8.
Moss A. F., Chrystal P. V., Yueming D. L., Selle P. H. and Liu S. Y. 2018. Responses in digestibilities of macro-minerals, trace minerals and amino acids generated by exogenous phytase and xylanase in canola meal diets offered to broiler chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 240: 22-30.
Mushtaq T., Sarwar M., Ahmad G., Mirza M. A., Nawaz H., Haroon M. M. and Noreen U. 2007. Influence of canola meal-based diets supplemented with exogenous enzyme and digestible lysine on performance, digestibility, carcass, and immunity responses of broiler chicken. Poultry Science, 86: 2144-2151.
Oba A., Pinheiro J. W., Silva C. A., Castro- Gomez R. J. H., Benites C. R., Ueno F. Y. and Almeida M. 2013. Characteristicas produtivas, qualitativas a microbiologicas de  galinhas poedeiras alimentadas com diferents niveis de complexo enzimatico. Animal Science, 34: 4179-4186.
Romero L. F., Parsons C. M., Utterback P. L., Plumdtead P. W. and Ravindran V. 2013. Comparative effect of dietary carbohydrases without or with protease on the ileal digestibility of energy and amino acids and AMEn in young broilers. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 181: 35-44.
Saha D. C. and Gilbreath R. L. 1991. Analytical recovery of chromium from diet and feces determined by colorimetry and atomicabsorption spectrophotometry. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 55: 433-446.
SAS Institute. 2004. SAS Users Guide. Version 9.1. SAS Institute. Cary, North Carolina.
Selle P. H., Cowieson A. J., Cowieson N. P. and Ravindran V. 2012. Protein-phytate interactions in pig and poultry nutrition: a reappraisal. Nutrition Research Reviews, 25: 1-17.
Shirazi-Beechey S. P., Smith M. W., Wang Y. and James P. S. 1991. Postnatal development of lamb intestinal digestive enzymes is not regulated by diet. The Journal of Physiology, 437: 691-698.
Torki M., Habibian M. and Davoodifar M. 2015. Response of laying hens to diet inclusion of canola meal as influenced by dietary nonphytate phosphorus level and microbial phytase supplementation. Journal of Livestock Science and Technologies, 3: 1-12.
Vieira Filho J. A., Geraldo A., Maachado L. C., Brito J. A., Bertecchini A. G. and Muran E. S. F. 2015. Effect of protease supplementation on production performance of laying hens. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 37: 29-33.
Zeb A. 1998. Possibilties and limitation of feeding rapeseed meal to broiler chicks. Ph.D. dissertation George August University, Gottingen.
Animal Production Research
Volume 9, Issue 4
March 2021
Pages 33-45

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics