Comparison of linear and non-linear models to predict the growth curve of dromedary camels

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Animal Science Research Department, Yazd Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Yazd, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Animal Science Research Department, Qom Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Qom, Iran

3 Expert, Animal Science Research Department, Yazd Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Yazd, Iran

4 MSc, Animal Science Research Department, Yazd Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Yazd, Iran

Abstract

The present study aimed to determine the best mathematical model to describe the growth curve of dromedary camels. For this purpose, the data recorded between 1990 and 2018 in the National Research and Development Station on Dromedary Camel located in Bafgh, Yazd province, were used. The records included the body weight of 747 dromedary camels at different ages (from birth to 14 months of age). To determine the best model describing the growth curve of dromedary camels, eight different mathematical models including linear, quadratic, cubic, Gompertz, Brody, logistic, monomolecular, and von Bertalanfy were compared. The age of camels was included in the model as an independent variable and the weight of camels as a dependent variable. The criteria for comparing the performance of the models were having the highest value of the corrected coefficient of determination (R2 adj) or the lowest values of Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the mean square error (MSE). Based on the results of this study, the accuracy of linear, quadratic, and cubic equations in describing the growth curve of dromedary camels was significantly lower than that of Gompertz, logistic, monomolecular, von Bertalanfy and Brody models. The results of the present study showed that the weight of dromedary camels could be predicted precisely up to weaning age (200 days), However, after weaning, due to the effect of different environmental conditions on the growth of camels and a sudden change in feed type, the increase in camel weight does not have a linear relationship with their age, and it is better to use other parameters such as biometric measurements to accurately estimate camel weight.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Abegaz S., Van Wyk J. B. and Olivier J. J. 2010. Estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters of growth curve and their relationship with early growth and productivity in Horro sheep. Archives Animal Breeding, 53: 85-94.
Beniwal B. K. and Chaudhary A. L. 1983. Growth pattern in Bikaneri camels. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 53: 101-104.
Bissa U. K., Yadav S. B. S., Khanna N. D. and Pant K. P. 1998. Growth curves of body weight from birth to four years in Bikaneri breed of Indian camel (Camelus dromedarius). Proceedings of the Third Annual Meeting for Animal Production under Arid Conditions, 2: 15-24.
Brody S. 1964. Bioenergetics and growth. Hafner Publishing Company, New York.
Darmani Kuhi H., Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh N., Lopez S., Falahi S. and France J. 2019a. Sinusoidal function to describe the growth curve of dairy heifers. Animal Production Science, 59(6): 1039-1047.
Darmani Kuhi H., France J., Lopez S. and Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh N. 2019b. A sinusoidal equation as alternative to conventional growth functions to describe the evolution of growth in quail. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 17(3): e0606.
Degen A. A., Elias E. and Kam M. 1987. A preliminary report on the energy intake and growth rate of early weaned camels. Animal Production, 45: 301-306.
Field C. R. 1979.  Camel growth and milk production in Marsabit district, N.  Kenya, Preliminary report. Workshop on camel, Khartoum, Sudan, 18-20 December. Pp. 215-240.
Gbangboche A. B., Gleke-alai R., Albuquerque L. G. and Leroy P. 2008.Comparison of non linear growth models to describe the growth curve in West African Dwarf sheep. Animal, 2: 1003-1012.
Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh N. and Ghorbani A. 2018. Modeling the growth curves for body weight and some biometric traits in Caspian horses (Equus ferus caballus) using non-linear mixed models. Mammalian Biology, 93: 5-12.
Hassen A., Wilson D. E., Rouse G. H. and Tait R. G. 2004. Use of linear and non-linear growth curves to describe body weight changes of young Angus bulls and heifers. Iowa State University Animal Industry Report. A. S. leaflet R1869.
Khanna N. D., Rai A. K. and Tandon S. N. 2004. Camel breeds of India. Journal of Camel Science, 1: 5-15.
Khanna N. D., Tandon S. N. and Rai A. K. 1990. Breeding parameters of Indian camel. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 60: 1347-1354.
Mehta S. C. 2008. Mathematical functions for the prediction of body weight gain in dromedary. Journal of Camel Research and Practice, 15: 239-244.
Mehta S. C., Bapna D. L. and Bhure S. K. 2010. Mathematical functions for the prediction of growth in Indian dromedary genotypes. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 80: 148-151.
Meredov B. 1989. The one humped camel. Animal Genetic Resources of USSR. Animal Production and Health paper No. 65, FAO: Rome, Italy. Pp. 351-355.
Mohammadi Y., Mokhtari M. S., Saghi D. A. and Shahdadi A. R. 2019. Modeling the growth curve in Kordi sheep: The comparison of non-linear models and estimation of genetic parameters for the growth curve traits. Small Ruminant Research, 177: 117-123.
Richard D. and Gerard D. 1985. Milk production in Dankali dromedaries (Ethiopia). International Conference on Animal Production in Arid Zone, held at Damascus, Syria on 7-12 September. Animal Breeding Abstracts, 58: 8133.
Snedecor G. W. and Cochran W. G. 1994. Statistical Methods. Pp. 398-419. Affiliated East-West Press Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
Statistical Analysis System (SAS). 2004. SAS Users’ Guide. Version 9.1. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, North Carolina, USA.
Tekelen J. T., Galvao A. C. and da Silva Robazza W. 2017. Comparing non-linear mathematical models to describe growth of deferent animals. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 39: 73-81.
Animal Production Research
Volume 10, Issue 4
December 2021
Pages 73-81

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics