اثر جایگزینی سطوح مختلف کنجاله کاملینا به‌جای کنجاله سویا بر عملکرد، فراسنجه‌های تخمیر شکمبه‌، متابولیت‌های خونی و رفتارشناسی تغذیه‌ای بره‌های پرواری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد تغذیه دام، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه لرستان

2 استادیار، گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه لرستان

3 دانشیار، گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه لرستان

4 استادیار، بخش تحقیقات علوم دامی، مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، اهواز، ایران

چکیده

در این تحقیق، اثر سطوح مختلف کنجاله کاملینا بر عملکرد رشد، فراسنجه‌های تخمیر شکمبه‌، متابولیت‌های خونی و رفتارشناسی تغذیه‌ای بره‌های نژاد لری-بختیاری بررسی شد. بدین منظور از 30 رأس بره نر نژاد لری-بختیاری با بازه سنی چهار تا پنج ماهه و میانگین وزنی 5±5/34 کیلوگرم به مدت 70 روز استفاده شد. دام‌ها با سه جیره آزمایشی شامل سطوح صفر، پنج و 10 درصد کنجاله کاملینا که جایگزین کنجاله سویا شده بود و 10 تکرار (بره) در هر تیمار در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی تغذیه شدند. نتایج نشان داد که با افزایش سطح کنجاله کاملینا در جیره، غلظت نیتروژن آمونیاکی شکمبه، اسید چرب پروپیونات و غلظت نیتروژن اوره‌ای خون به­طور خطی افزایش یافت (05/0>P). هرچند، جیره‌های آزمایشی اثری بر pH شکمبه و غلظت سایر اسیدهای چرب فرار نداشت. میزان فعالیت آنزیم شکمبه‌اییای کربوکسی متیل سلولاز با افزایش سطح کنجاله کاملینا در جیره به­طور خطی کاهش یافت (05/0>P)، اما فعالیت سایر آنزیم‌های شکمبه‌ای تحت تأثیر جیره‌های آزمایشی قرار نگرفت. جیره‌های غذایی تأثیری بر مصرف ماده ‌خشک و NDF، وزن نهایی بدن و میانگین افزایش وزن روزانه نداشتند. به­جز میزان نشخوار کردن و نسبت نشخوار کردن به ماده خشک مصرفی که با افزایش سطح کنجاله کاملینا در جیره به­طور خطی افزایش یافت (05/0>P)، سایر صفات رفتارشناسی تغذیه‌ای تحت ثأثیر جیره‌های آزمایشی قرار نگرفتند. در کل، نتایج پژوهش حاضر نشان داد که استفاده از کنجاله کاملینا، به عنوان یک منبع پروتئینی جدید، به­جای کنجاله سویا تا سطح 10 درصد ماده خشک جیره غذایی بره‌های پرواری قابل توصیه است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of substituting different levels of Camellina sativa meal instead of soybean meal on performance, rumen fermentation parameters, blood metabolites, and feeding behavior of fattening lambs

نویسندگان [English]

  • S. Nazari 1
  • A. Azizi 2
  • A. Kiani 3
  • A. Sharifi 4
1 MSc Student, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Animal Science Research Department, Khuzestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Ahvaz, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: In the animal husbandry industry, more than 70% of the production costs are related to nutrition. Among the nutrients consumed by livestock, protein is one of the most important and expensive nutrients. Due to Iran's limitations in the production of oilseeds and consequently the production of protein meals, providing the protein needs of livestock has been associated with many problems. The use of new and especially local protein sources in ruminant feeding is one of the main solutions to cover the lack of protein sources and reduce the import of these sources, and it also reduces production costs in the livestock and poultry industry. Camelina sativa medicinal-oil plant has attracted a lot of attention, especially in recent years, and its most important advantage is extreme resistance to drought and cold conditions. The presence of high amounts of crude protein (CP), energy, and essential amino acids in camelina meal makes it a useful and potential option for use in the livestock and poultry feed industry. It was shown that the CP content of camelina meal was 41.9% of dry matter. Also, camelina meal has higher CP content and similar rumen undegradable protein compared to canola meal. In terms of lysine and methionine amino acids, which are important in muscle growth, camelina meal is considered a rich source. Camelina is a plant with a short growth period of 85-100 days and recently in Iran at the beginning of the camelina development project, the DH1025 line was produced, which is cultivated under the name of Soheil variety on a wide scale. Various studies have been conducted on the use of camelina meal for different purposes in ruminant nutrition. This is while there is little information about the nutrition of camelina meal and especially Soheil variety in the nutrition of ruminants in Iran. Therefore, this research aimed to investigate the effects of different levels of camelina meal on growth performance, rumen fermentation parameters, blood metabolites, and nutritional behavior of Lori-Bakhtiari lambs.
Materials and methods: Thirteen Lori-Bakhtiari male lambs of four to five months of age with a mean live weight of 34.5±5 kg were used for 70 days of the experimental fattening period. Lambs were assigned to three experimental treatments (10 lambs per treatment) in a completely randomized design. Three experimental diets contained camelina meal at levels of zero (control), five, and 10% of dry matter (DM). Experimental diets were formulated according to nutritional requirement tables for small ruminants and were similar in terms of energy and protein. Also, the ratio of forage to concentrate in the diets was considered to be 30 to 70. From the first day, the animals were kept and reared in individual stalls. Two weeks before the start of the experiment (adaptation period), the lambs were vaccinated against enterotoxemia and the amount of 20 mL of anti-parasitic syrup (5% Clozantel) per 10 kg of body weight and niclosamide anti-parasitic syrup (seven to 10 mL per lamb) was fed to the lambs. Camelina meal used in this project was a genetically modified and localized variety. Experimental rations were provided in a completely mixed form (TMR) to the lambs daily at 8:00 am and 4:00 pm.
Results and discussion: Results showed that increasing the level of camelina meal in the diet increased linearly the concentration of ruminal ammonia, propionate, and blood urea nitrogen (P<0.05), while ruminal pH and other individual volatile fatty acids, and blood parameters were not affected by the experimental diets (P>0.05). The activity of carboxymethyl cellulase enzymes decreased linearly with increasing the level of camelina meal in the diet (P<0.05). However, the activity of other rumen microbial enzymes was not affected by the experimental diets (P>0.05). In terms of behavioral traits, diets had no effect on DM and NDF intake, and also final body weight and average daily gain (P>0.05). Except for the amount of rumination and the ratio of rumination to DM intake, which increased linearly with increasing the level of camelina meal in the diet (P<0.05), other nutritional behaviors were not affected by the experimental diets (P>0.05).
Conclusions: In general, the results of the present study showed that the use of camelina meal, as a new source of protein, instead of soybean meal up to 10% of dietary DM of fattening lambs is recommended.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Fattening lamb
  • Rumen fermentation
  • Nutritional behavior
  • Enzyme activity
  • Camelia meal
Agarwal N. 2000. Estimation of fiber degrading enzyme. In: Chaudhary L. C., Agarwal N., Kamra D. N. and Agarwal D. K. editor. Feed microbiology. Izatnagar (India): CAS Animal Nutrition. Pp. 278-291.
AOAC. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC.
USA.
Aschenbach J. R., Penner G. B., Stumpff F. and Gäbel G. 2011. Ruminant nutrition symposium: Role of fermentation acid absorption in the regulation of ruminal pH. Journal of Animal Science, 89(4): 1092-1107.
Azizi A., Hashemi M. and Sharifi A. 2018. Effect of different dietary levels of carrot pulp on in vitro gas production, nutrients digestibility and rumen fermentation. Animal Production Research, 7(4): 47-56. (In Persian).
Azizi-Shotorkhoft A., Fazaeli H., Papi N. and Rezaei J. 2014. Effect of different levels of processed broiler litter on the feed intake, digestibility, performance, ruminal and blood metabolites in Moghani male lambs. Iranian Journal of Animal Science, 45(4): 385-392. (In Persian).  
Bayat A., Kairenius P., Stefanski T., Leskinen H., Comtet-Marre S. and Forano E. 2015.  Effect of camelina oil or live yeasts (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on ruminal methane production, rumen fermentation, and milk fatty acid composition in lactating cows fed grass silage diets. Journal of Dairy Science, 98(5): 3166-3181.
Benchaar C., Romero-Pérez G., Chouinard P., Hassanat F., Eugene M. and Petit H. 2012. Supplementation of increasing amounts of linseed oil to dairy cows fed total mixed rations: effects on digestion, ruminal fermentation characteristics, protozoal populations, and milk fatty acid composition. Journal of Dairy Science, 95(8): 4578-4590.
Bergman E. N. 1990. Energy contributions of volatile fatty acids from the gastrointestinal tract in various species. Physiological Review, 70(2): 567-590.
Brandao V. L. N., Dai X., Paula E. M., Silva L. G. Marcondes M. I., Shenkoru T. and Faciola A. P. 2018. Effect of replacing calcium salts of palm oil with camelina seed at 2 dietary ether extract levels on digestion, ruminal fermentation, and nutrient flow in a dual-flow continuous culture system. Journal of Dairy Science, 101(6): 5046-5059.‏
Broderick G. and Kang J. H. 1980. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. Journal of Dairy Science, 63(1): 64-75.
Cappellozza B. I., Cooke R. F., Bohnert D. W., Cherian G. and Carroll J. A. 2012. Effects of camelina meal supplementation on ruminal forage degradability, performance, and physiological responses of beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 90(11): 4042-4054.
Cherian G. 2012. Camelina sativa in poultry diets: opportunities and challenges. Biofuel co-products as livestock feed: opportunities and challenges. Rome, FAO. Pp. 303-310.
Colombini S., Broderick G. A., Galasso I., Martinelli T., Rapetti L., Russo R. and Reggiani R. 2014. Evaluation of camelina sativa (L.) crantz meal as an alternative protein source in ruminant rations. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 94(4): 736-743.
Gesch R. W. and Johnson J. M. F. 2015. Water use in camelina-soybean dual cropping systems. Agronomy Journal, 107(3): 1098-1104.
Ghamarnia H., Kahrizi D. and Rostami-Ahmadvandi H. 2020. Camelina: a low-input and adaptable plant. Razi University Press. (In Persian).
Halmemies-Beauchet-Filleau A., Shingfield K. J., Simpura I., Kokkonen T., Jaakkola S., Toivonen V. and Vanhatalo A. 2016. Effect of incremental amounts of camelina oil on milk fatty acid composition in lactating cows fed diets based on a mixture of grass and red clover silage and concentrates containing camelina expeller. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(1): 305-324.
Hurtaud C. and Peyraud J. L. 2007. Effects of feeding camelina (seeds or meal) on milk fatty acid composition and butter spread ability. Journal of Dairy Science, 90(11): 5134-5145.
Kahrizi D. and Rostami-Ahmadvandi H. 2015. First report of camelina (Camelina sativa) biotechnologically breeding and cultivation in Iran. The 1st International and 9th National Congress of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian).
Kahrizi D., Rostami-Ahmadvandi H. and Akbarabadi A. 2015. Feasibility cultivation of camelina (Camelina sativa) as medicinal-oil plant in rain fed conditions in Kermanshah-Iran's First Report. Journal of Medicinal Plants and By-products, 4(2): 215-218.
Kononoff P. J., Lehman H. A. and Heinrichs A. J. 2002. Technical note- a comparison of methods used to measure eating and ruminating activity in confined dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 85(7): 1801-1803.
Kotchoni O. S., Shonukan O. and Gachomo W. E. 2003. Bacillus pumillus, BPCR16, a promising candidate for cellulase production under conditions of catabolic repression. African Journal of Biotechnology, 2(6): 140-146.
Lardy G. P. and Kerley M. S. 1994. Effect of increasing the dietary level of rapeseed meal on intake by growing beef steers. Journal of Animal Science, 72(8): 1936-1942.                                                        
Lawrence R. D. and Anderson J. L. 2018. Ruminal degradation and intestinal digestibility of camelina meal and carinata meal compared with other protein sources. The Professional Animal Scientist, 34(1): 10-18.‏
Lawrence R. D., Anderson J. L. and Clapper J. A. 2016. Evaluation of camelina meal as a feedstuff for growing dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science, 99(8): 6215-6228.
Lee S. M. and Koo Y. M. 2001. Pilot-scale production of cellulose using Trichoderma reesei Rut C-30 in fed-batch mode. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 11(2): 229-233.
Lopes J. C., Harper M. T., Giallongo F., Oh J., Smith L., Ortega-Perez A. M.,  Harper S. A., Melgar A., Kniffen D. M., Fabin R. A. and Hristov A. N.  2017. Effect of high-oleic-acid soybeans on production performance, milk fatty acid composition, and enteric methane emission in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(2): 1132-1135.
Lowry O. H., Rosebrough N. J., Farr A. L. and Randall R. J. 1951. Protein measurement with the folin-phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 193(1): 262-275.
Mahdavi M. 2011. Evaluation of guar meal and its comparison with other oilseed meals in feeding Zel fattening lambs. MSc Thesis, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran. (In Persian).
Maia M. R. G., Chaudhary L. C., Figueres L. and Wallace R. J. 2007. Metabolism of polyunsaturated fatty acids and their toxicity to the microflora of the rumen. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 91(4): 303-314.
Martin C., Ferlay A., Mosoni P., Rochette Y., Chilliard Y. and Doreau M. 2016. Increasing linseed supply in dairy cow diets based on hay or corn silage: Effect on enteric methane emission, rumen microbial fermentation, and digestion. Journal of Dairy Science, 99(5): 3445-3456.
Matthäs B. 1997. Ant nutritive compounds in different oilseeds. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 99(5): 170-174.
McVay K. A. 2008. Camelina production in Montana. Montana State University Extension, USA.
Menke K. H. and Steingass H. 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research and Development, 28(2): 7-55.
Miller J. L. 1959. Modified DNS method for reducing sugars. Analytical Chemistry, 31(3): 426-429.
Moser B. R. and Steven F. V. 2010. Evaluation of alkyl esters from camelina sativa oil as biodiesel and as blend components in ultra-low-sulfur diesel fuel. Bioresource Technology, 101(2): 646-653.
National Research council (NRC). 2007. Nutrient requirements of small ruminants: Sheep, Goats, Cervids, and New World Camelids. Washington (DC, USA): National Academy of Sciences.
Oltjen J. W. and Beckett J. L. 1996. Role of ruminant livestock in sustainable agricultural systems. Journal of Animal Science, 74(6): 1406-1409.
Paula E. M., Silva L. G., Brandao V. L. N., Dai X. and Faciola A. P. 2019. Feeding canola, camelina and carinata meals to ruminants. Animal, 9(10): 704-718.
Pires A. V., Eastridge M. L., Firkins J. L. and Lin Y. C. 1997. Effects of heat treatment and physical processing of cotton seed on nutrient digestibility and production performance by lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 80(8): 1685-1694.
Reveneau C., Ribeiro C. V. D. M., Eastridge M. L., St-Pierre N. R. and Firkins J. L. 2005. Processing whole cottonseed moderates fatty acid metabolism and improves performance by dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 88(12): 4342-4355.
Russell J. B. and Strobel H. J. 1989. Effect of ionophores on ruminal fermentation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 55(1): 1-6.
SAS. 2005. User’s Guide: Statistics, Version 9.0 Edition. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.
Schulmeister T. M., Ruiz-Moreno M., Silva G. M., Garcia-Ascolani M., Ciriaco F. M., Henry D. D., Lamb G. C., Dubeux J. C. B. and Dilorenzo N. 2019. Evaluation of brassica carinata meal on ruminant metabolism and apparent total tract digestibility of nutrients in beef steers. Journal of Animal Science, 97(3): 1325-1334.
Shingfield K. J., Ahvenjärvi S., Toivonen V., Vanhatalo A., Huhtanen P. and Griinari J. M. 2008. Effect of incremental levels of sunflower-seed oil in the diet on ruminal lipid metabolism in lactating cows. British Journal of Nutrition, 99(5): 971-983.
Sizmaz Ö., Çalik A. and Bundur A. 2021. In vitro fermentation characteristics of camelina meal comparison with soybean meal. Livestock Studies, 61(1): 9-13
Steppa R., Szkudelska K., Wójtowski J., Stanisz M., Szumacher-Strabel M., Czyżak- Runowska G., Cieślak A., Markiewicz-Kęszycka M. and Pietrzak M. 2014. The metabolic profile of growing lambs fed diets rich in unsaturated fatty acids. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 98(5): 914-920.
Ueda K., Ferlay A., Chabrot J., Loor J. J., Chilliard Y. and Doreau M. 2003. Effect of linseed oil supplementation on ruminal digestion in dairy cows fed diets with different forage: concentrate ratios. Journal of Dairy Science, 86(12): 3999-4007.
Van Soest P. J. 1982. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. Corvallis, OR, USA: Cornell University Press. Pp. 253-280.
Van Soest P. J., Robertson J. B. and Lewis A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74(10): 3583-3597.
Wang S., Kreuzer M., Braun U. and Schwarm A. 2017. Effect of unconventional oilseeds (safflower, poppy, hemp, camelina) on in vitro ruminal methane production and fermentation. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 97(11): 3864-3870.
Xin H., Falk K. C. and Yu P. 2013. Studies on brassica carinata seed. 2. Carbohydrate molecular structure in relation to carbohydrate chemical profile, energy values, and biodegradation characteristics. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 61(42): 10127-10134.
Yang S. L., Bu D. P., Wang J. Q., Hu Z. Y., Li D., Wei H. Y., Zhou L. Y. and Loor J. J. 2009. Soybean oil and linseed oil supplementation affect profiles of ruminal microorganisms in dairy cows. Animal, 3(11): 1562-1569.