بررسی نسبت شکاف تکنولوژیکی و عوامل مؤثر بر کارآیی فنی واحدهای زنبورداری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی ارشد، گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده علوم کشاورزی، دانشگاه گیلان

2 استادیار، گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده علوم کشاورزی‬، دانشگاه گیلان

3 دانشیار، گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده علوم کشاورزی‬، دانشگاه گیلان

چکیده

مطالعه حاضر با هدف بررسی کارآیی فنی واحدهای زنبورداری و عوامل مؤثر بر آن انجام شده است. در این مطالعه، نمونه­ها با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی ساده تعیین و داده‌های مورد نیاز به­صورت حضوری و با تکمیل پرسشنامه از 150 زنبوردار شهرستان رودسر در سال 1399 جمع‌آوری شد. در مطالعه حاضر جهت شناسایی داده‌های پرت در مجموعه داده‌ها از روش ابر داده استفاده شد. بعد از حذف داده‌های پرت، نمونه مورد بررسی با استفاده از تحلیل خوشه‌ای به دو گروه‌ همگن از نظر اندازه تقسیم شد. برای برآورد کارآیی فنی نسبت به مرز گروهی از مدل تحلیل پوششی داده‌ها استفاده ‌شد و جهت برآورد کارآیی فنی نسبت به مرز پوششی نیز الگوی فرامرزی مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد میانگین نسبت شکاف تکنولوژیکی زنبور‌داران مورد مطالعه حدود 76 درصد است، یعنی اگر تمامی زنبورداران مورد مطالعه به فناوری فرامرزی برسند امکان 24 درصد افزایش تولید وجود دارد. زنبوردارانی که کوچ می‌کنند از نسبت شکاف تکنولوژیکی بالاتری برخوردار هستند و نتیجه آزمون کولموگروف اسمیرنوف نشان داد که این اختلاف از نظر آماری معنی‌دار است. نتایج رگرسیون چند متغیره عوامل مؤثر بر کارآیی فنی نشان داد متغیرهای سابقه کار، نوع مالکیت، شرکت در کلاس‌های آموزشی و ترویجی، شغل اصلی زنبوردار، تعداد کندوها و متغیر کوچ کردن اثر مثبت و معنی‌دار بر کارآیی فنی زنبورداران دارند. با توجه به اینکه بین نسبت شکاف تکنولوژیکی زنبوردارانی که کوچ می‌کنند و کوچ نمی‌کنند از نظر آماری اختلاف معنی‌داری وجود دارد، بنابراین با برطرف نمودن مشکلات مربوط به کوچ زنبورداران می‌توان با استفاده از منابع فعلی، سطح تولید زنبورداران را بهبود بخشید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigation of technological gap ratio and factors affecting the technical efficiency of beekeeping units

نویسندگان [English]

  • K. Masumi 1
  • R. Esfanjari Kenari 2
  • M. K. Motamed 3
1 Former MSc Student, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Beekeeping in Iran is one of the production activities that has unique characteristics. One of the characteristics of beekeeping is creating employment with the use of low capital. Therefore, beekeeping can be a good source of income for people with little capital. Although beekeeping is currently one of the low-income jobs, it is possible to increase the income of beekeepers by improving their technical efficiency. Efficiency is considered a very important factor in increasing the production and productivity of production resources, especially in the agricultural economy and rural development of developing countries. On the one hand, these countries face a lack of resources and limited opportunities, and on the other hand, they do not use the existing technologies efficiently; Therefore, studies related to the inefficiency in the production of livestock products and efforts to improve the efficiency and optimal use of resources in these countries will help to increase the productivity of production factors and increase the production of agricultural products. This study aimed to investigate the technological gap ratio (TGR) and factors affecting the technical efficiency of beekeeping in Rudsar Count in Guilan Province of Iran.
Materials and methods: The required data were collected by completing questionnaires from 150 beekeepers in Rudsar County in 2020, which were determined using a random sampling method. In the present study, the data cloud method was used to identify the outliers in the data set. After deleting the outliers, the sample was divided into two homogeneous groups in terms of size using cluster analysis. The BCC model was used to estimate the technical efficiency relative to the group frontier and the metafrontier model was used to estimate the technical efficiency relative to the coverage frontier.
Results and discussion: The results showed that the average TGR of the studied beekeepers is about 76%. This means that if all the studied beekeepers reach metafrontier technology, it is possible to increase production by 24%. Beekeepers that migrate have a higher technological gap ratio and the result of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test showed that the difference in TGR is statistically significant. The results of multivariate regression of factors affecting technical efficiency showed that the variables of work experience, type of ownership, participation in training and extension classes, the main job of the beekeeper, number of beehives, and migration variable had a positive and significant effect on technical efficiency of beekeepers. Considering that there is a statistically significant difference between the TGR of beekeepers who migrate and do not migrate, so by solving the problems related to beekeeping migration, the level of beekeepers' production can be improved by using current resources. In the present study, the variable of the number of beehives and ownership had a positive and significant effect on the technical efficiency of beekeepers studied, so the technical efficiency of beekeepers can be increased by increasing the number of beehives and expanding private ownership.
Conclusions: By solving the problems related to the migration of beekeepers, it is possible to improve the production level of beekeepers by using current resources. In addition, by increasing the number of hives and developing private ownership, the technical efficiency of beekeepers can be increased. Considering that some farmers and gardeners do not allow beekeepers' hives to settle in their fields and gardens due to ignorance of the importance of bee pollination, it is necessary to promote cultural activities in this regard. Also, providing the necessary conditions for beekeepers to have easier and cheaper access to production inputs, such as giving low-interest loans, can increase the production of beekeepers and increase their income.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Data cloud
  • Rudsar County
  • Beekeeping
  • Metafrontier model
  • Technological gap ratio
Adanakis Y. 2014. The Sustainable Intensification of Farming Systems: Evaluating Agricultural Productivity, Technical and Economic Efficiency. Ph.D. thesis. University of Reading, United Kingdom.
Amidi A. 1999. Sampling theory and its applications, University Publishing, Volume I. Pp. 74-86. (In Persian).
Bayat N., Rastegar A., Khorasani M. A. and Ghanbarinasab A. 2011. The determination and analysis of effective factors on slump of livestock farm economic in countryside area (case study: Paridar and Mahdaviyeh villages-Malayer city. Journal of Countryside Researches, 15: 153-181.
Blancard S. and Martin E. 2014. Energy efficiency measurement in agriculture with imprecise energy content information. Journal of Energy Policy, 16: 198-208.
Chandra D. S., Prasad R. P., Bahadur T. R., Kumar S. and Bahadur K. D. 2017. Allocative efficiency of resource use on beekeeping in chitwan district of Nepal. International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology, 4: 1447-1451.
Charnes A., Cooper W. W. and Rhodes E. 1978. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 6: 429- 444.
Esfanjari Kenari R., Ahmadpour Borazjani M., Kaikha A. A., Ziaei S. and Salarpour M. 2020. Determination of technical efficiency and optimum size of rice farms in Mazandaran province (Case study: Fereydunkenar County). International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development, 10(3): 257-265.
Esfanjari Kenari R. and Zibaei M. 2012. Investigation of technical efficiency and technological gap of Iranian laying hen industrial units. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 26(4): 252-260. (In Persian).
Gürer B. and Akyol E. 2018. An empirical analysis of technical efficiency determinants in beekeeping farms: evidence and policy implications from Niğde Province, Turkey. Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development, 2: 343-359.
Karimi A., Nazarian H. and Jafari A. 2007. Identification of Fars honey bee plant resources from three families in Fars province (Asteraceae, papilionaceae and Lamiaceae). Veterinary Researches & Biological Products, 20(2), 101-111. (In Persian).
Kiani Abri M., Khosh Akhlagh R. and Nilforoshan A. 2000. Analysis of technical, allocative and economic efficiency of beekeepers in Isfahan province. Agricultural Economics and Development, 8(32): 272-261. (In Persian).
LaPlante A. E. 2015. A Comprehensive Study of Bank Branch Growth Potential and Growth Trends through the Development of a Unique DEA Formulation and a New Restricted DEA Model. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of Toronto, Canada.
Makri P., Papanagiotou P. and Papanagiotou E. 2015. Efficiency and economic analysis of Greek beekeeping farms. Journal of Agricultural Science, 3: 479-484.
Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture. 2020. Iran's livestock and poultry products. Retrieved February. 16, 2020, from https://www.jkgc.ir/fa. (In Persian).
Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture. 2022. Iran's livestock and poultry products. Retrieved January. 2, 2022, from https://www.jkgc.ir/fa. (In Persian).
Mir Mohammad Sadeghi J., Edris M. A. and Mostajeran M. 2007. Factors affecting the income of beekeepers in Isfahan, Khomeini Shahr and Najafabad, Development and Productivity, 2(6): 2-9. (In Persian).
Mojavarian M. and Salari Bana H. 2013. Investigating the relationship between efficiency (with variable efficiency) of production with the size of Mazandaran beekeeping unit. Agricultural Economics and Development, 21(83): 19-34. (In Persian).
O'donnell C. J., Rao D. and Battese G. 2008. Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratio. Journal of Empirical Economics, 2: 231-255.
Parhizkari A. and Mozaffari M. 2016. Investigating the economic situation of the beekeeping industry along with the analysis of the effects of the increase in the price of production inputs (case study: beekeepers of Alamut pastures). Agricultural Economics Research, 8(30), 47-75.
Qaderzadeh H., Kanani F. and Vaziri A. 2014. Assessing the productivity of honey production inputs in Kurdistan province (Case study: beekeepers in Sanandaj), the sixth conference on agricultural research findings, Sanandaj. (In Persian).
Sadeghi J. M. 1997. Factors affecting wage rate among bakery workers in the city of Isfahan, Iran. Journal of Research in Middle East Economics, 1: 67-75.
Shiferaw K. and Gebremedhin D. 2016. Technical efficiency of small-scale honey producers in Ethiopia: A stochastic frontier analysis. International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) Ethiopia. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa: 69332.
Sotodeh V. and Mahmuodi Karamjavan J. 2017. Discriminant analyses of efficient indexes on apiaries production in East Azerbaijan County. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education Research, 9(4), 37-46. (In Persian).
Vural H. and Karaman S. 2016. Socio-economic analysis of beekeeping and the effects of beehive types on honey production. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2: 223-227.
Wilson P. W. 1993. Detecting Outliers in Deterministic Nonparametric Frontier Models with Multiple Outputs. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 3: 319-323.
Wongchai A., Liu W. B. and Peng K. C. 2012. DEA metafrontier analysis on technical efficiency differences of national universities in Thailand. International Journal on New Trends in Education and their Implications, 3: 3-12.
Yarahmadi B., Mohammadi Saei M., Ghorbani K. and Pahlavani R. 2020. Determining the efficiency of bee units using the parametric frontier method in Lorestan province (Case study of Khorramabad city). Livestock Production Research, 11(27): 135-126. (In Persian).