اثر پوشش پروتئینی پر هیدرولیز شده بر کیفیت داخلی تخم ‏مرغ طی دوره نگهداری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده علوم دامی و صنایع غذایی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان

2 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه پرورش و مدیریت طیور، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس

3 دانشیار، گروه پرورش و مدیریت طیور، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس

چکیده

تأثیر پوشش پروتئینی پر هیدرولیز شده بر کیفیت داخلی تخم‏ مرغ در طول دوره نگهداری به مدت چهار هفته و در دمای اتاق بررسی شد. صد و بیست عدد تخم‏ مرغ از سویه Hy-Line W36 در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی به سه تیمار اختصاص داده شدند. تخم ‏مرغ‌ها شماره ‏گذاری شده و برای هر تیمار، 40 عدد تخم بر اساس وزن به­ صورت صعودی در دسته­های سه­تایی مرتب شدند. تیمارها شامل تیمار شاهد (بدون پوشش)، پوشش پروتئینی حاوی 10 درصد پر هیدرولیز شده (وزنی/ حجمی) و پوشش پروتئینی حاوی 20 درصد پر هیدرولیز شده بودند. صفات کیفی شامل وزن تخم‏ مرغ، واحد هاو، وزن سفیده، وزن زرده، رنگ زرده، pH سفیده، pH زرده، استحکام پوسته، در هشت تخم ­مرغ از هر تیمار در نمونه تازه و نمونه­ های پس از یک، دو، سه و چهار هفته نگهداری اندازه‏ گیری شدند. نتایج این آزمایش نشان داد که ارتفاع سفیده و واحد هاو در گروه دارای پوشش 20 درصد پر هیدرولیز شده نسبت به سایر گروه ‏ها در تمام طول دوره نگهداری به­ طور معنی ‏داری بالاتر بود (05/0P<). درجه کیفی تخم ­مرغ و pH سفیده به ترتیب دارای بالاترین و پایین‏ترین میزان در گروه دارای پوشش 20 درصد پر هیدرولیز شده طی هفته‏ های اول و سوم بودند (05/0P<). کمترین درصد افت وزن در طول آزمایش مربوط به تخم ‏مرغ‏های دارای پوشش 10 درصد پر هیدرولیز شده بود (05/0P<). بر اساس نتایج این آزمایش به­ نظر می‏ رسد که استفاده از پوشش‏ها در طول دوره نگهداری تخم‏ مرغ می ‏تواند سبب افزایش ماندگاری با حفظ کیفیت تخم ‏مرغ شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of protein coating of hydrolyzed feather on internal quality of eggs during storage period

نویسندگان [English]

  • H. Mirzaei 1
  • L. Darabi 2
  • M. A. Karimi Torshizi 3
1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Food Technology, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Ahvaz, Iran
2 Ph.D. Student, Department of Poultry Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Poultry Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Egg is one of the most valuable food items in the human diet. Several factors, such as diseases, bird age, diet, temperature, humidity, transportation, and storage time can affect the quality of eggs. The longer the storage time, the more CO2 penetrates the eggshell, particularly at room temperature, resulting in decreased internal quality. Eggs are a perishable product and must be stored in the refrigerator from production to consumption. Refrigeration increases production costs and ultimately leads to an increase in the final product price. Currently, there is a growing interest in developing effective methods to preserve the internal quality of eggs. The use of edible coatings after washing the eggs can help preserve the internal quality of the eggs during long-term storage. Edible coatings are an available technology that is currently used to control moisture, gas exchange, and oxidation processes for many products. The use of suitable active and antimicrobial edible films and coatings can potentially reduce the microbial load of egg surfaces, reduce undesirable changes, and increase their shelf life. Proteins are commonly used as film-forming materials. Proteins that have been previously investigated for egg coating development include whey protein isolate or concentrate, zein, and rice protein concentrate. Chicken feathers are a by-product of the poultry industry and are mostly disposed of without any processing, causing severe environmental pollution. To date, hydrolyzed feather protein has not been reported as an egg coating, so this study investigated the effect of hydrolyzed feather protein coating at two concentrations on the shelf life of chicken eggs under room temperature storage conditions.
Materials and methods: In this study, a total of 120 fresh white-shelled eggs were obtained from Hy-Line W36 laying hens. The eggshells were washed to remove any surface contamination, then the eggs were numbered and randomly selected for each coating method. The samples were divided into three treatments of 40 eggs each treatment in a completely randomized design. The treatments included control (0%, without coating), a coating containing 10% (w/v) hydrolyzed feather, and a coating containing 20% hydrolyzed feather. Pure glycerol (Serva, Germany) was added to hydrolyzed feathers (2% w/v). The feather hydrolyzed protein was prepared at Tarbiat Modares University using alkaline hydrolyzed raw chicken feathers obtained from a commercial broiler slaughterhouse (Iran Borchin, Tehran). The chemical analysis of hydrolyzed feather protein was performed based on standard methods (dry matter, protein, ash, and fat), and the amino acid profile of the protein was also tested. Some nutritional or toxic important minerals were also measured. Egg weight, Haugh units, albumen weight, yolk weight, yolk color, albumen pH, yolk pH, and shell strength were measured during storage weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4.
Results and discussion: According to the data of this study, the height of the egg white and Haugh units in the stored eggs were significantly affected by the experimental coatings (P<0.05). The height of the egg white and Haugh units were significantly higher in the treatment with 20% hydrolyzed protein coating compared to other treatments (P<0.05). The yellowness of the egg yolk was significantly affected by the experimental coatings in the third week (P<0.05). The highest egg quality score was observed in the first and third weeks in eggs with 20% hydrolyzed feather protein coating (P<0.05). The eggshell characteristics were not affected by the experimental coatings. The egg white and yolk percentages were not affected by the experimental coatings. The pH of the egg white in the first and third weeks decreased significantly in eggs with 20% hydrolyzed feather protein coating compared to other treatments (P<0.05). The pH of the yolk was not affected by the experimental treatments. The pH in both the yolk and egg white increased over time. Eggs with coating had significantly less weight loss compared to uncoated eggs (P<0.05). The lowest weight loss was related to eggs with 10% and 20% hydrolyzed feather protein coating, which had a significant difference with uncoated eggs (P<0.05). The weight loss after seven days of storage in uncoated eggs (2.12%) was almost double the weight loss in coated eggs (1.16%). The weight loss after 14 days of storage at room temperature in uncoated eggs (4.21%) was almost double the weight loss in coated eggs (2.35%). The weight loss after 21 days of storage at room temperature in uncoated eggs (6.8%) was almost double the weight loss in coated eggs (3.35%). The weight loss after 28 days of storage at room temperature in uncoated eggs (8.27%) was almost double the weight loss in coated eggs (4.80%). Based on the results of this study, it was found that the use of hydrolyzed feather protein coating can improve the internal quality of eggs during the storage period. For future research, it is recommended to conduct further studies on the effect of hydrolyzed feather protein coating on the quality characteristics of eggs during storage. Previous studies have been conducted on improving the internal quality of eggs during storage using protein coatings with different hydrolysis. Some of these studies have shown that protein coating with hydrolysis can significantly improve the quality characteristics of eggs. Additionally, some studies have been conducted on the effect of protein coating using different proteins such as rice protein, meat protein, whey protein isolated, or whey protein concentrate and zein.
Conclusions: There was no significant difference in weight loss between 10% and 20% hydrolyzed feather protein coverage in different weeks, but the 10% hydrolyzed feather protein coverage provided better protection against weight loss. Since weight loss is mainly due to eggshell water evaporation, it was observed that despite being thinner, the 10% hydrolyzed feather protein coverage provided better protection compared to the 20% hydrolyzed feather protein coverage. Therefore, the use of coverages during egg storage can increase shelf life while maintaining egg quality.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Hydrolyzed feather
  • Protein coating
  • Egg
  • Storage period
Afshar, R., Karimi Torshizi, M. A., Shariatmadari, F., & Eivakpour, A. (2023). Effect of alkaline hydrolyzed feather meal on performance, intestinal‎ morphology, and meat oxidation of Arian broiler chickens. Iranian Journal of Animal Science. doi: 10.22059/ijas.2023.351226.653918 [In Persian]
Alleoni, A. C. C., Jacomino, A. P., & Rosa, A. S. (2006). Recobrimento de laranja'Pêra'com filme de concentrado protéico de soro de leite associado a plastificantes. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 41, 1221-1226.‏ doi: 10.1590/S0100-204X2006000800002
Almeida, D. S. D., Schneider, A. F., Yuri, F. M., Machado, B. D., & Gewehr, C. E. (2016). Egg shell treatment methods effect on commercial eggs quality. Ciência Rural, 46, 336-341.‏ doi: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20140904.
Atabak, A. H., Karimi Torshizi, M. A., & Rahimi, S. (2021). Effect of supplementing different levels of alkaline hydrolyzed feather meal and‎ dried corn steep liquor on performance and anti-oxidation indices of broiler chicken. Iranian Journal of Animal Science, 52(3), 203-215. doi: 10.22059/ijas.2021.312300.653807 [In Persian]
Caner, C. (2005). Whey protein isolate coating and concentration effects on egg shelf life. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 85(13), 2143-2148.‏ doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2225
Caner, C., & Cansiz, Ö. (2008). Chitosan coating minimises eggshell breakage and improves egg quality. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 88(1), 56-61.‏ doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2962
Caner, C., & Yüceer, M. (2015). Efficacy of various protein-based coating on enhancing the shelf life of fresh eggs during storage. Poultry Science, 94(7), 1665-1677.‏ doi: 10.3382/ps/pev102
Dhall, R. K. (2013). Advances in edible coatings for fresh fruits and vegetables: a review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 53(5), 435-450.‏  doi: 10.1080/10408398.2010.541568
Fennema, O. R. (1985). Food Chemistry. 2nd edition. Newyork and Basel: Marcel Dekker Inc., USA.
García, M. A., Martino, M. N., & Zaritzky, N. E. (1998). Plasticized starch-based coatings to improve strawberry (Fragaria× Ananassa) quality and stability. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 46(9), 3758-3767.‏ doi: 10.1021/JF980014C
Goda, D. A., Diab, M. A., El-Gendi, H., Kamoun, E. A., Soliman, N. A., & Saleh, A. K. (2022). Fabrication of biodegradable chicken feathers into ecofriendly-functionalized biomaterials: characterization and bio-assessment study. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 18340. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23057-4
Han, J. H. (2014). Edible films and coatings: a review. In: Innovations in food packaging (pp. 213-255): Elsevier.
Haugh, H. (1937) The haugh unit for measuring egg quality. The U.S. Egg & Poultry Magazine, 43, 552-555, 572-573.
Kemps, B. J., De Ketelaere, B., Bamelis, F. R., Mertens, K., Decuypere, E. M., De Baerdemaeker, J. G., & Schwägele, F. (2007). Albumen freshness assessment by combining visible near-infrared transmission and low-resolution proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Poultry Science, 86(4), 752-759. doi: 10.1093/ps/86.4.752
Khodaparast, D., Karimi Torshizi, M. A., & Rahimi, S. (2021). Effect of alkaline hydrolyzed feather meal on performances and lipid oxidation of meat and egg of laying quails. Animal Sciences Journal, 33(129), 87-100. doi: 10.22092/asj.2019.126136.1916 [In Persian]
Kim, S. H., No, H. K., Kim, S. D., & Prinyawiwatkul, W. (2006). Effect of plasticizer concentration and solvent types on shelf-life of eggs coated with chitosan. Journal of Food Science, 71(4), S349-S353.‏ doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00008.x
Kock, J. W. (2006). Physical and mechanical properties of chicken feather materials Ph.D. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Lesnierowski, G., & Stangierski, J. (2018). What's new in chicken egg research and technology for human health promotion?-A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 71, 46-51.‏ doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.10.022
Moore, G. R. P., Martelli, S. M., Gandolfo, C., do Amaral Sobral, P. J., & Laurindo, J. B. (2006). Influence of the glycerol concentration on some physical properties of feather keratin films. Food Hydrocolloids, 20(7), 975-982.‏ doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2005.11.001
Pires, P. G. D. S., Pires, P. D. D. S., Cardinal., K. M., Leuven, A. F. R., Kindlein, L., & Andretta, I. (2019). Effects of rice protein coatings combined or not with propolis on shelf life of eggs. Poultry Science, 98(9), 4196-4203.‏ doi: 10.3382/ps/pez155
Rosser, F. (1942). Preservation of eggs: ii. Surface contamination on eggshell in relation to spoilage. Canadian Journal of Research, 20, 291-296. doi: 10.1139/cjr42d-024
Schrooyen, P. M., Dijkstra, P. J., Oberthür, R. C., Bantjes, A., & Feijen, J. (2001). Partially carboxymethylated feather keratins. 2. Thermal and mechanical properties of films. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 49(1), 221-230.‏ doi: 10.1021/jf0004154
 Sharaf Eddin, A., Ibrahim, S. A., & Tahergorabi, R. (2019). Egg quality and safety with an overview of edible coating application for egg preservation. Food Chemistry, 296, 29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.05.182
Song, N. B., Jo, W. S., Song, H. Y., Chung, K. S., Won, M., & Song, K. B. (2013). Effects of plasticizers and nano-clay content on the physical properties of chicken feather protein composite films. Food Hydrocolloids, 31(2), 340-345.‏ doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2012.11.024
Stadelman, W. J. and Cotterill, O. J. (1995). Egg Science and Technology. 4th Edition, The Haworth Press, NY, 115-119.
Vieira, M. G. A., da Silva, M. A., dos Santos, L. O., & Beppu, M. M. (2011). Natural-based plasticizers and biopolymer films: A review. European Polymer Journal, 47(3), 254–263. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.12.011
Wan, V. C. H., Kim, M. S., & Lee, S. Y. (2005). Water vapor permeability and mechanical properties of soy protein isolate edible films composed of different plasticizer combinations. Journal of Food Science, 70(6), e387-e391.‏ doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.tb11443.x