اثر متقابل آنزیم کربوهیدراز و ترکیب فیتوژنیک بر عملکرد، قابلیت هضم و خصوصیات کیفی تخم مرغ در مرغ‌های تخم گذار تغذیه شده با سطح انرژی کاهش یافته

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه مهندسی کشاورزی، واحد مشهد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مشهد، ایران

چکیده

به­منظور بررسی اثر متقابل مولتی‌آنزیم و ترکیب فیتوژنیک‌ بر عملکرد، قابلیت هضم مواد مغذی و خصوصیات کمّی و کیفی تخم‌مرغ در مرغ‌های تخم‌گذار، تعداد 320 قطعه مرغ تخم‌گذار در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی در آزمایش فاکتوریل به هشت تیمار، چهار تکرار و 10 مرغ در هر تکرار از سن 70 تا 78 هفتگی اختصاص داده شدند. تیمارهای آزمایشی عبارت بودند از: 1) جیره پایه، 2) جیره پایه + 200 گرم در تن خوراک آنزیم، 3) جیره پایه + 02/0 درصد ترکیب فیتوژنیک، 4) جیره پایه + 02/0 درصد ترکیب فیتوژنیک + 200 گرم در تن خوراک آنزیم، 5) جیره با انرژی کاهش یافته، 6) جیره با انرژی کاهش یافته + 200 گرم در تن خوراک آنزیم،  7) جیره با انرژی کاهش یافته + 02/0 درصد ترکیب فیتوژنیک و 8) جیره با انرژی کاهش یافته + 200 گرم در تن خوراک آنزیم + 02/0 درصد ترکیب فیتوژنیک. نتایج این تحقیق نشان داد که مرغ‌های دریافت­کننده جیره دارای انرژی توصیه شده همراه با دو ترکیب گیاهی و آنزیم، بیشترین درصد تولید، وزن تخم‌مرغ، توده تخم‌مرغ، درصد زرده تخم‌مرغ، رنگ زرده تخم‌مرغ، انرژی قابل سوخت و ساز، پروتئین خام و الیاف خام جیره و کمترین میزان خوراک مصرفی را نسبت به سایر تیمارهای آزمایشی داشتند و مرغ‌های تخم­گذار دریافت­کننده جیره با انرژی کاهش یافته، کمترین میزان این فراسنجه‌ها را داشتند. افزودن هر دو ترکیب افزودنی منجر به بهبود عملکرد و خصوصیات تخم‌مرغ مرغ‌های تخم­گذار دریافت­کننده جیره با انرژی کاهش یافته شد، به­طوری که تفاوت معنی‌داری با گروه شاهد نداشت. به­طور کلی، افزودن مولتی‌آنزیم و ترکیب فیتوژنیک به جیره‌های کم انرژی منجر به افزایش قابلیت استفاده از جیره‌ها و قابلیت رقابت با جیره‌های با انرژی قابل سوخت و ساز بالاتر شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The interaction effect of carbohydrase enzyme and phytogenic compound on performance, digestibility, and egg quality characteristics in laying hens fed with reduced energy levels

نویسندگان [English]

  • E. Salehifar
  • A. Ghasban Sakhil
  • R. Bahari Kashani
Department of Agricultural Science, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: As the cost of high-energy feed ingredients like oils and cereals continues to rise, creating cost-effective poultry diets while maintaining production performance has become increasingly challenging. One approach to tackle this issue is to lower dietary metabolizable energy (ME) levels and offset the reduction by incorporating feed additives such as multi-enzymes and phytogenic compounds. Multi-enzymes enhance nutrient digestibility by breaking down anti-nutritional factors like non-starch polysaccharides, which improves gut function and nutrient absorption. Phytogenic compounds, sourced from herbs and spices, are recognized for their antimicrobial, antioxidant, and digestive stimulant properties. However, their effectiveness in low-energy diets is not yet fully understood. This study aimed to assess the individual and combined impacts of multi-enzymes and a phytogenic compound on the performance, nutrient digestibility, and egg quality of laying hens fed reduced-energy diets.
Materials and methods: A total of 320 Hy-Line W-36 laying hens, aged 70 weeks, were randomly assigned to eight dietary treatments using 2×2×2 factorial arrangements in a completely randomized design, with eight replicates of five birds each. The study continued until the hens reached 78 weeks of age. The experimental factors included two levels of dietary metabolizable energy (2800 and 2650 kcal/kg), the inclusion or exclusion of multi-enzyme supplementation (200 g/ton), and the presence or absence of a standardized phytogenic compound (0.02%). The eight dietary treatments were as follows: (1) control diet (2800 kcal/kg), (2) control diet with enzyme, (3) control diet with phytogenic compound, (4) control diet with both enzyme and phytogenic compound, (5) reduced-energy diet (2650 kcal/kg), (6) reduced-energy diet with enzyme, (7) reduced-energy diet with phytogenic compound, and (8) reduced-energy diet with both enzyme and phytogenic compound. Data were collected on feed intake, egg production, egg weight, feed conversion ratio, mortality, nutrient digestibility (using acid-insoluble ash marker), and egg quality traits, including yolk color, shell strength, and Haugh unit.
Results and discussion: Hens on the control diet (2800 kcal/kg) demonstrated significantly superior (P<0.05) performance in egg production, egg weight, egg mass, and feed conversion ratio compared to those on a reduced-energy diet (2650 kcal/kg). However, supplementing the reduced-energy diet with multi-enzymes and phytogenic compounds markedly enhanced these parameters. Notably, hens receiving both enzyme and phytogenic compound supplements with the reduced-energy diet achieved production performance comparable to the control group, indicating that these additives effectively offset the lower energy content. Digestibility studies revealed that supplementation with enzymes and phytogenic compounds, whether alone or combined, significantly improved (P<0.05) the digestibility of dry matter, crude protein, crude fiber, and metabolizable energy, especially in reduced-energy diets. This improvement likely resulted from enhanced enzyme-substrate interactions, better gut morphology, and improved microbial balance in the gastrointestinal tract. Egg quality also benefited from the supplements. Phytogenic compounds enhanced yolk color through their natural carotenoid content, while enzyme supplementation improved eggshell strength, likely by increasing calcium absorption. A significant three-way interaction among energy level, enzyme, and phytogenic compound was observed for various traits, including egg production, egg mass, feed conversion ratio, and yolk pigmentation, underscoring a synergistic effect of these dietary components.
Conclusions: Reducing dietary energy from 2800 to 2650 kcal/kg adversely affected the performance, nutrient digestibility, and egg quality of laying hens. However, adding multi-enzymes and phytogenic compounds helped counteract these negative effects. The combination of these additives was especially effective in improving performance, digestibility, and egg quality in hens on reduced-energy diets. This makes the additives a viable strategy for cost-effective and sustainable poultry production. These findings highlight the potential of integrating enzyme-phytogenic mixtures into layer diets with lower metabolizable energy to maintain optimal productivity without sacrificing economic efficiency.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Enzyme
  • Phytogenic compound
  • Performance
  • Egg quality
  • Laying hen
Carre, B.A., Idi, S., Maisonnier, J.P., Melcion, F.X., Oury Gomez, J., & Pluchard, P. (2002). Relationships between Digestibilities of food components and characteristics of wheats introduced as the only cereal source in a broiler chicken diet. British Poultry Science, 43, 404-415. doi: 10.1080/00071616022000010190
Coutts, J. A., & Wilson, G. C. (1990). Egg Quality Handbook. Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Australia.
DePersio, S., Utterback, P. L., Utterback, C. W., Rochell, S. J., O'Sullivan, N., Bregendahl, K., Arango, J., Parsons, C. M., & Koelkebeck, K. W. (2015). Effects of feeding diets varying in energy and nutrient density to Hy-Line W-36 laying hens on production performance and economics. Poultry Science, 94(2),195-206. doi: 10.1016/J.aninu.2017.04.005
Ding, X., Yu, Y., Su, Z., & Zhang, K. (2017). Effects of essential oils on performance, egg quality, nutrient digestibility and yolk fatty acid profile in laying hens. Animal Nutrition, 3, 127-131.
Dipeolu, M. A. I., Eruvbetine, D., Oguntona, E. B., Bankole, O. O., & Sowunmi, K. S. (2005). Comparison of effects of antibiotics and enzyme inclusion in diets of laying birds. Archivos de Zootecnia, 54, 3-11.
El-Hack, M. A., & Alagawany, M. (2015). Performance, egg quality, blood profile, immune function, and antioxidant enzyme activities in laying hens fed diets with thyme powder. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 24, 127-133. doi: 10.22358/jafs/65653.2015
Harms, R. H., Russel, G. B., & Sloan, D. R. (2000). Performance of four strains of commercial layers with major changes in dietary energy. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 9, 535-541. doi: 10.1093/japr/9.4.535
Jalal, M. A., Scheideler, S. E., & Marx, D. (2006). Effect of bird cage space and dietary metabolizable energy level on production parameters in laying hens. Poultry Science, 85(2), 306-311. doi: 10.1093/ps/85.2.306
Khan, S. H., Atif, M., Mukhtar, N., Rehman, A., & Fareed, G. (2011). Effects of supplementation of multi-enzyme and multi-species probiotic on production performance, egg quality, cholesterol level and immune system in laying hens. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 39(4), 386-398. doi: 10.1080/09712119.2011.599614
Lee, K. W., Everts, H., & Beyen, A. C. (2003). Dietary carvacrol lowers body gain but improves feed conversion in female broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 12(4), 394-399. doi: 10.1093/japr/12.4.394
Leeson, S., & Summers, J. D. (2005). Commercial poultry nutrition. 3rd edition, Nottingham University Press.
Lokaewmanee, K., Yamauchi, K. E., Komori, T., & Saito, K. (2010). Effects on egg yolk colour of paprika or paprika combined with marigold flower extracts. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 9(4), 356-359. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2010.e41
Mirzaie, S., Zaghari, M., Aminzadeh, S., & Shivazad, M. (2012). The effects of non-starch polysaccharides contents of wheat and xylanase supplementation on the intestinal amylase, amino peptides and lipase activities, ileal viscosity and fat digestibility in layer diet. Iranian Journal of Biotechnology, 10(3), 208- 214.
Platel, K., & Srinivasan, K. (2003). Digestive stimulant action of spices: A myth or reality. Indian Medicine, 119(5), 167-179.
Rama Rao, S. V., Ravindran, V., Srilatha, T., Panda, A. K., & Raju, M. (2011). Effect of dietary concentrations of energy, crude protein, lysine, and methionine on the performance of White Leghorn layers in the tropics. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 20(4), 528-541. doi: 10.3382/japr.2010-00267
SAS Institute. (2004) SAS User’s Guide. Version 9.4 ed. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.
Scott, T. A., Silversides, F. G., & Bedford, M. R. (2001a). The effect of phytase supplementation on production parameters and nutrient digestibility in laying hens. Poultry Science, 80(2), 239-244. doi: 10.1093/ps/80.2.239
Scott, T. A., Kampen, R., & Silversides, F. G. (2001b). The effect of phytase in nutrient-reduced corn- and wheat-based diets fed to two strains of laying hen. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 81, 393-401. doi: 10.4141/A00-085
Shehata, A. A. M. (2000). Using some Aquaticplants in feeding chicks. Ph.D. thesis. Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Egypt.
Sohail, S. S., Bryant, A. C., Roland Sr, D. A., Apajalahti, J. H. A., & Pierson, E. M. (2003). Influence of Avizyme 1500 on performance of commercial Leghorns. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 12, 284-290. doi: 10.1093/japr/12.3.284
Summers, J. & Leeson, S. (1993). Influence of diets varying in nutrient density on the development and reproductive performance of White Leghorn pullets. Poultry Science, 72(8), 1500-1509. doi: 10.3382/ps.0721500
Weiss, R. F., & Fintelmann, V. (1999). Lehrbuch der Phytotherapie. Hippokrates Verlag, Stuttgart. P. 485.
Windisch, W., Schedle, K., Plitzner, C., & Kroismayr, A. (2008). Use of phytogenic products as feed additives for swine and poultry. Journal of Animal Science, 86, E140-E148. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0459
Wu, G., Bryant, M., Voitle, R., & Roland Sr, D. (2005). Effect of dietary energy on performance and egg composition of Bovans White and Dekalb White hens during phase I. Poultry Science, 84(10), 1610-1615. doi: 10.1093/ps/84.10.1610
 
Wu, G., Bryant, M., Gunawardana, P., & Roland Sr, D. (2007). Effect of nutrient density on performance, egg components, egg solids, egg quality, and profits in eight commercial leghorn strains during phase one. Poultry Science, 86(4), 691-697. doi: 10.1093/ps/86.4.691