اثر تزریق درون تخم مرغی جدایه های لاکتوباسیلوس از دستگاه گوارش طیور بومی ایران بر قابلیت جوجه درآوری، پاسخ ایمنی و عملکرد رشد جوجه های گوشتی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 مرکز تحقیقات ابریشم کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی (AREEO)، رشت، ایران

2 گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده علوم کشاورزی، دانشگاه گیلان

3 پژوهشکده بیوتکنولوژی جانوری، پژوهشگاه بیوتکنولوژی کشاورزی ایران (ABRII)، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی (AREEO)، رشت، ایران

چکیده

برای بررسی اثر تزریق درون تخم­مرغی جدایه­های لاکتوباسیلوس طیور بومی ایران بر قابلیت جوجه­درآوری، پاسخ ایمنی و عملکرد رشد جوجه­های گوشتی، در روز 18 دوره جوجه­کشی، 672 عدد تخم‌‌مرغ دارای جنین (سویه راس 308) به 24 واحد آزمایشی شامل شش تیمار و چهار تکرار (28 عدد تخم­مرغ در هر تکرار) در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی تقسیم شدند. تیمارهای  مرحله پرورش عبارت بودند از جوجه­های تفریخ شده از تخم­مرغ­های: 1- تزریق سرم فیزیولوژیک (سالین 9%، شاهد منفی)، 2-تزریق سرم فیزیولوژیک (سالین 9%) به­همراه آنتی­بیوتیک محرک رشد (آویلامایسین) در جیره (شاهد مثبت)، 3- تزریق جدایه لاکتوباسیلوس سالیواریوس Pls2، 4- تزریق جدایه لاکتوباسیلوس روتری Plr6، 5- تزریق جدایه لاکتوباسیلوس روتری  Plr4و 6- تزریق جدایه لاکتوباسیلوس روتریPlr2. هر یک از جدایه­ها به­مقدار 105 CFU برای تزریق در هم تخم­مرغ مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. تزریق جدایه­های لاکتوباسیلوسی، اثر منفی بر قابلیت جوجه­درآوری نداشت (05/0<P). تزریق جدایه­های لاکتوباسیلوسی موجب کاهش ضریب تبدیل خوراک در مقایسه با گروه شاهد منفی شد (05/0>P). شاخص کارآیی تولید اروپایی در گروه تزریق جدایه­های لاکتوباسیلوسی بیشتر از گروه شاهد منفی بود (05/0>P). تزریق Plr4 و Plr2 موجب افزایش عیار آنتی­بادی کل اولیه و ثانویه علیه سلول­های گلبول قرمز گوسفندی در مقایسه با گروه شاهد منفی شد (05/0>P). تزریق جدایه­های لاکتوباسیلوسی موجب کاهش غلظت کلسترول سرم خون جوجه­های گوشتی شد (05/0>P). استنتاج نهایی این است که تزریق لاکتوباسیلوس­های مورد استفاده در این تحقیق به­ویژه Plr4 و Plr2، در مراحل انتهایی جنینی به­عنوان ترکیب میکروبی مناسب، بدون اثر منفی بر قابلیت جوجه­درآوری ارزیابی شده و می­توانند از راه اثرگذاری مفید بر پاسخ ایمنی و فراسنجه­های خونی موجب بهبود عملکرد جوجه­های گوشتی شوند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of in ovo injection of Lactobacillus isolates from the gastrointestinal tract of Iranian native poultry on hatchability, immune response, and growth performance in broilers

نویسندگان [English]

  • M. Ghanaatparast-Rashti 1
  • M. Mottaghitalab 2
  • M. Royan 3
  • R. Seighalani 3
1 Iran Silk Research Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Rasht, Iran
2 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
3 Animal Biotechnology Research Institute, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Rasht, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Modern industrial poultry production removes the natural relationship between day-old chicks and hens. Consequently, the establishment of gut microbiota largely depends on the bacteria present in the hatchery and barn environment. On the other hand, chicks may be exposed to pathogenic agents while still at the hatchery, during hatching, sex determination, vaccination, and transportation, even before consuming their first feed. Since the initial contact with microbes might involve pathogenic bacteria, introducing beneficial bacteria into the gastrointestinal tract of chicks can help reduce the risk of pathogen settlement. The primary colonization of beneficial microbes is not only crucial for competing against pathogenic bacteria but also plays a significant role in stimulating factors associated with the growth and maturation of the immune system. Additionally, in the agricultural industries, the use of antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) in animal diets has been reduced or even eliminated due to concerns regarding bacterial antibiotic resistance and antibiotic residues in animal products. As a result, several alternatives to AGPs have appeared in the poultry market. One of the many alternatives that are currently being investigated is the use of probiotics. Probiotics are defined as a “live microbial feed supplement which beneficially affects the host animal by improving its intestinal microbial balance”. Among the probiotics used in poultry, Lactobacillus isolates have been particularly valued for their positive effects on gut health. Furthermore, Lactobacillus naturally dominates the gastrointestinal tract of poultry. The beneficial effects of these bacteria occur through various mechanisms, including competitive exclusion, maintenance of protective intestinal barriers, and immune system enhancement. Probiotics can upregulate the expression of immune-related genes such as cytokines, interferons, and interleukins, which directly or indirectly increase the serum levels of immunoglobulins in response to antigens. Ideally, the best way to avoid the need for drugs is to prevent pathogen proliferation as early as possible. It has been commonly assumed that microbial colonization occurs after hatching in poultry; however, scientific evidence suggests that live bacteria may be present in the intestine in small quantities even before hatching. One favorable method of probiotic administration is the in ovo injection of probiotics into the amniotic sac at the late stage of embryonic development. This approach can facilitate the early establishment of beneficial bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract to create an environment that prevents pathogen colonization. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate in ovo administration as a method for delivering some Lactobacillus isolates derived from the gut microbiota of Iranian native poultry to the intestines of broiler chicks before hatching and assess their effects on hatchability, immune system development, serum metabolites, and growth performance.
Materials and methods: To investigate the effect of in ovo injection of Lactobacillus isolates of Iranian native poultry in broilers, on day 18th of incubation, 672 embryonated eggs (Ross 308 strain) were assigned into 24 experimental units, in a completely randomized design with six treatments and four replicates (28 eggs per replicate). The hatched chicks, based on the same division as the in ovo injection stage, were raised for six weeks. Experimental treatments included: 1. In ovo injection of physiological saline (saline 9%; negative control), 2. In ovo injection of physiological saline (saline 9%) and antibiotic growth promoter (avilamycin) in the diet (positive control), 3. In ovo injection of Lactobacillus salivarius isolate Pls2 (MH595986; 105 CFU/egg), 4. In ovo injection of Lactobacillus reuteri isolate Plr6 (MF686483; 105 CFU/egg), 5. In ovo injection of Lactobacillus reuteri isolate Plr4 (MF686463­; 105 CFU/egg), and 6. In ovo injection of Lactobacillus reuteri isolate Plr2 (MG547731; 105 CFU/egg). Percent of hatchability was calculated as the percent of healthy hatched chicks from fertile eggs. To evaluate the immune response of the broilers, hemagglutination assay and hemagglutination inhibition methods were separately used to measure the antibody titers against sheep red blood cells (SRBC) and Newcastle disease virus (NDV), respectively, and were expressed as the log2. To measure glucose, triglyceride, and total cholesterol from serum, a spectrophotometric method via liquiform kits was used. Important growth performance metrics, such as body weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, and European Production Efficiency Factor (EPEF), were evaluated throughout the entire rearing period. Results are reported as means, and differences among treatments were compared using the Tukey test, and significance was determined at P<0.05.
Results and discussion: In ovo injection of Lactobacillus, isolates had no negative effect on hatchability (P>0.05). In ovo injection of Lactobacillus isolates and positive control groups showed lower feed conversion ratio compared to the negative control group (P<0.05). The EPEF in the positive control group and in ovo administered Lactobacillus isolates was higher than the negative control group (P<0.05). Among the lactobacilli used, in ovo injection of Plr2 showed similar EPEF to the positive control group (P>0.05). Broiler dietary supplementation of antibiotic growth promoter and in ovo injection of Plr4 and Plr2 increased total and secondary antibody titer against SRBC compared to the negative control group (P<0.05). The positive control group and in ovo injection of Plr2 showed higher antibody titers against NDV than the negative control group (P<0.05).  In ovo injection of Pls2, Plr6, and Plr4 increased serum glucose compared to control groups (P<0.05). In ovo injection of Plr4 decreased the triglyceride concentration of serum compared to the control groups at 42 days of age (P<0.05). In ovo injection of the Lactobacillus isolates reduced the cholesterol concentration of serum in broilers (P<0.05).
Conclusions: In general, the injection of Lactobacillus isolates used in this study, particularly Plr4 and Plr2, at the late embryonic stage as appropriate microbial compounds, may improve broiler growth performance without adversely affecting hatchability and by positively influencing the immune response and serum metabolites.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Immune response
  • In ovo injection
  • Broiler
  • Growth performance
  • Lactobasillus
Ahmadi, R., Mottaghitalab, M., Royan, M., & Seighalani, R. (2023). The effect of Lactobacillus reuteri isolated from gastrointestinal tract of Iranian native poultry on growth performance, carcass characteristics, blood parameters and immune response of broiler chickens. Research on Animal Production, 13(38), 38-48. doi: 10.52547/rap.13.38.38 [In Persian]
Alagawany, M., Abd El-Hack, M. E., Farag, M. R., Sachan, S., Karthik, K., & Dhama, K. (2018). The use of probiotics as eco-friendly alternatives for antibiotics in poultry nutrition. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(11), 10611-10618. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1687-x
Alizadeh, M., Bavananthasivam, J., Shojadoost, B., Astill, J., Taha-Abdelaziz, K., Alqazlan, N., & Sharif, S. (2021). In ovo and oral administration of probiotic Lactobacilli modulate cell-and antibody-mediated immune responses in newly hatched chicks. Frontiers in Immunology, 12(12), 664387. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.664387
Alizadeh, M., Shojadoost, B., Astill, J., Taha-Abdelaziz, K., Karimi, S. H., Bavananthasivam, J., & Sharif, S. (2020). Effects of in ovo inoculation of multi-Strain Lactobacilli on cytokine gene expression and antibody-mediated Immune responses in chickens. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7(105), 1-11. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00105
Alkhalf, A., Alhaj, M., & Al-Homidan, I. (2010). Influence of probiotic supplementation on blood parameters and growth performance in broiler chickens. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 17(3), 219-225. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2010.04.005
Apata, D. F. (2008). Growth performance, nutrient digestibility and immune response of broiler chicks fed diets supplemented with a culture of Lactobacillus bulgaricus. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 88(7), 1253-1258. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.3214
Awad, W. A., Ghareeb, K., Abdel-Raheem, S., & Böhm, J. (2009). Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic and synbiotic on growth performance, organ weights, and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 88(1), 49-56. doi: 10.3382/ps.2008-00244
Awais, M. M., Jamal, M. A., Akhtar, M., Hameed, M. R., Anwar, M. I., & Ullah, M. I. (2019). Immunomodulatory and ameliorative effects of Lactobacillus and Saccharomyces based probiotics on pathological effects of eimeriasis in broilers. Microbial Pathogenesis126, 101-108. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.10.038
Beck, C. N., McDaniel, C. D., Wamsley, K. G., & Kiess, A. S. (2019). The potential for inoculating Lactobacillus animalis and Enterococcus faecium alone or in combination using commercial in ovo technology without negatively impacting hatch and post-hatch performance. Poultry Science, 98(12), 7050-7062. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez441
Bermudez-Brito, M., Plaza-Díaz, J., Muñoz-Quezada, S., Gómez-Llorente, C., & Gil, A. (2012). Probiotic mechanisms of action. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, 61(2), 160-174. doi: 10.1159/000342079
Bhogoju, S., Khwatenge, C. N., Taylor-Bowden, T., Akerele, G., Kimathi, B. M., Donkor, J., & Nahashon, S. N. (2021). Effects of Lactobacillus reuteri and Streptomyces coelicolor on growth performance of broiler chickens. Microorganisms, 9(6), 1341. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9061341
Bohlool, Z., Hashemi, S. R., Sadeghi, A., Jafari, S. M., Heidari, M., & Seifdavati, J. (2024). Evaluation of probiotic properties of predominant lactic acid bacteria isolated from the gastrointestinal tract and reproductive system of Ross 308 broiler breeders. Animal Production Research, 12(4), 37-49. doi: 10.22124/AR.2024.24901.1775 [In Persian]
Brisbin, J. T., Gong, J., Orouji, S., Esufali, J., Mallick, A. I., Parvizi, P., & Sharif, S. (2011). Oral treatment of chickens with Lactobacilli influences elicitation of immune responses. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, 18(9), 1447-1455. doi: 10.1128/CVI.05100-11
Chai, C., Guo, Y., Mohamed, T., Bumbie, G. Z., Wang, Y., Zeng, X., & Sun, W. (2023). Dietary Lactobacillus reuteri Sl001 improves growth performance, health-related parameters, intestinal morphology and microbiota of broiler chickens. Animals, 13(10), 1690. doi: doi.org/10.3390/ani13101690
De Oliveira, J. E., Van der Hoeven-Hangoor, E., Van de Linde, I. B., Montijn, R. C., & Van Der Vossen, J. M. B. M. (2014). In ovo inoculation of chicken embryos with probiotic bacteria and its effect on posthatch Salmonella susceptibility. Poultry Science, 93(4), 818-829. doi: 10.3382/ps.2013-03409
Duan, A. Y., Ju, A. Q., Zhang, Y. N., Qin, Y. J., Xue, L. G., Ma, X., & Yang, S. B. (2021). The effects of in ovo injection of synbiotics on the early growth performance and intestinal health of chicks. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8, 658301. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.658301
Ghanaatparast‐Rashti, M., Mottaghitalab, M., & Ahmadi, H. (2018). In ovo feeding of nutrients and its impact on post‐hatching water and feed deprivation up to 48 hr, energy status and jejunal morphology of chicks using response surface models. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 102(2), e806-e817. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12838
Gonmei, G., Sapcota, D., Saikia, G. K., Deka, P., Mahanta, J. D., Kalita, N., & Talukdar, J. K. (2019). Studies on immune response to Newcastle disease virus in broiler chickens fed with Lactobacillus reuteri PIA16 isolated from the gut of indigenous chicken of Assam, India. Veterinary World, 12(8), 1251. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2019.1251-1255
Hedlund, L., Whittle, R., & Jensen, P. (2019). Effects of commercial hatchery processing on short-and long-term stress responses in laying hens. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 2367. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38817-y
Huff, G. R., Huff, W. E., Jalukar, S., Oppy, J., Rath, N. C., & Packialakshmi, B. (2013). The effects of yeast feed supplementation on turkey performance and pathogen colonization in a transport stress/Escherichia coli challenge. Poultry Science, 92(3), 655-662. doi: 10.3382/ps.2012-02787
JaiswaL, S. K., Tomar, S., Saxena, V., & Uniyal, S. (2022). Supplementation of Lactobacillus reuteri isolated from red jungle fowl along with mannanoligosaccaride improves growth performance, immune response and gut health in broiler Chicken. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 93(6), 572-577. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1645541/v2
Kalavathy, R., Abdullah, N., Jalaludin, S., & Ho, Y. W. (2003). Effects of Lactobacillus cultures on growth performance, abdominal fat deposition, serum lipids and weight of organs of broiler chickens. British Poultry Science, 44(1), 139-144. doi: 10.1080/0007166031000085445
Kim, G. B., Seo, Y. M., Kim, C. H., & Paik, I. K. (2011). Effect of dietary prebiotic supplementation on the performance, intestinal microflora, and immune response of broilers. Poultry Science, 90(1), 75-82. doi: 10.3382/ps.2010-00732
Kornasio, R., Halevy, O., Kedar, O., & Uni, Z. (2011). Effect of in ovo feeding and its interaction with timing of first feed on glycogen reserves, muscle growth, and body weight. Poultry Science, 90(7), 1467-1477. doi: 10.3382/ps.2010-01080
Lehman, D. C. (2014). Biochemical identification of gram-negative bacteria. Textbook of iagnostic Microbiology-E-Book. 182 p.
Lutful-Kabir, S. M. (2009). The role of probiotics in the poultry industry. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 10(8), 3531-3546. doi: 10.3390/ijms10083531
Majidi-Mosleh, A., Sadeghi, A. A., Mousavi, S. N., Chamani, M., & Zarei, A. (2017). Ileal MUC2 gene expression and microbial population, but not growth performance and immune response, are influenced by in ovo injection of probiotics in broiler chickens. British Poultry Science, 58(1), 40-45. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2016.1237766
Melese, K., Alemu, T., & Desalegn, A. (2025). Probiotic effects of Lactobacillus reuteri and Pediococcus pentosaceus on growth performance, blood biochemistry, and antibody response in broiler chickens. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 56(2), 1333-1343. doi: 10.1007/s42770-024-01593-7
Menconi, A. A., Wolfenden, A. D., Shivaramaiah, S., Terraes, J. C., Urbano, T., Kuttel, J., & Tellez, G. (2011). Effect of lactic acid bacteria probiotic culture for the treatment of Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg in neonatal broiler chickens and turkey poults. Poultry Science, 90(3), 561-565. doi: 10.3382/ps.2010-01220
Mohiti-Asli, M., & Ghanaatparast-Rashti, M. (2017). Feeding antioxidant vitamin and vegetable oils to broilers: vitamin E reduced negative effect of soybean oil on immune response and meat lipid oxidation. Animal Production Science, 58(10), 1829-1836. doi.org/10.1071/AN16677
Mohsin, M., Zhang, Z., & Yin, G. (2022). Effect of probiotics on the performance and intestinal health of broiler chickens infected with Eimeria tenella. Vaccines, 10(1), 97. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10010097
Mountzouris, K. C., Tsirtsikos, P., Kalamara, E., Nitsch, S., Schatzmayr, G., & Fegeros, K. (2007). Evaluation of the efficacy of a probiotic containing Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, and Pediococcus strains in promoting broiler performance and modulating cecal microflora composition and metabolic activities. Poultry Science, 86(2), 309-317. doi: 10.1093/ps/86.2.309
Muyyarikkandy, M. S., Mathew, E., Kuttappan, D., & Amalaradjou, M. A. (2023). Research Note: In ovo and in-feed probiotic supplementation improves layer embryo and pullet growth. Poultry Science, 102(12), 103092. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.103092
Pan, D., & Yu, Z. (2014). Intestinal microbiome of poultry and its interaction with host and diet. Gut Microbes, 5(1), 108-119. doi: 10.4161/gmic.26945
Pender, C. M., Kim, S., Potter, T. D., Ritzi, M. M., Young, M., & Dalloul, R. A. (2017). In ovo supplementation of probiotics and its effects on performance and immune-related gene expression in broiler chicks. Poultry Science96(5), 1052-1062. doi: 10.3382/ps/pew381
Peterson, A. L., Qureshi, M. A., Ferket, P. R., & Fuller, J. C. (1999). Enhancement of cellular and humoral immunity in young broilers by the dietary supplementation of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate. Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology, 21(2), 307-330. doi: 10.3109/08923979909052765
Rajput, N., Naeem, M., Ali, S., Zhang, J. F., Zhang, L., & Wang, T. (2013). The effect of dietary supplementation with the natural carotenoids curcumin and lutein on broiler pigmentation and immunity. Poultry Science, 92(5), 1177-1185. doi: 10.3382/ps.2012-02853
Reuben, R. C., Sarkar, S. L., Ibnat, H., Roy, P. C., & Jahid, I. K. (2022). Novel mono‐and multi‐strain probiotics supplementation modulates growth, intestinal microflora composition and haemato‐biochemical parameters in broiler chickens. Veterinary Medicine and Science, 8(2), 668-680. doi: 10.1002/vms3.709
Ross. (2014). Ross 308 Broiler Nutrition Specifications. First edition. Ross Broiler Ltd., Scotland, UK.
SAS Institute. (2011). SAS User's Guide. Version 9.3. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
Teague, K. D., Graham, L. E., Dunn, J. R., Cheng, H. H., Anthony, N., Latorre, J. D., & Tellez, G. (2017). In ovo evaluation of FloraMax®-B11 on Marek’s disease HVT vaccine protective efficacy, hatchability, microbiota composition, morphometric analysis, and Salmonella enteritidis infection in broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 96(7), 2074-2082. doi: 10.3382/ps/pew494
Tsega, K. T., Kagira, J. M., Tessema, N. B., & Mekuria, S. A. (2024). Effects of Lactobacillus probiotics supplemented with concentrate feed on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and caecal microflora of RIR chickens. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 10(1), 2311959. doi: 0.1080/23311932.2024.2311959
Vieira, S. L., Almeida, J. G., Lima, A. R., Conde, O. R. A., & Olmos, A. R. (2005). Hatching distribution of eggs varying in weight and breeder age. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 7(2), 73-78. doi: 10.1590/S1516-635X2005000200002
Wang, L., Feng, Y., Zhang, X., & Wu, G. (2019). Effect of probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri XC1 coexpressing endoglucanase and phytase on intestinal pH and morphology, carcass characteristics, meat quality, and serum biochemical indexes of broiler chickens. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 48, e20180273. doi: 10.1590/rbz4820180273
Wang, Y., & Gu, Q. (2010). Effect of probiotic on growth performance and digestive enzyme activity of Arbor Acres broilers. Research in Veterinary Science, 89(2), 163-167. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.03.009
Wilson, K. M., Rodrigues, D. R., Briggs, W. N., Duff, A. F., Chasser, K. M., & Bielke, L. R. (2019). Evaluation of the impact of in ovo administered bacteria on microbiome of chicks through 10 days of age. Poultry Science, 98(11), 5949-5960. doi: 10.3390/poultry4020015
Wilson, K. M., Rodrigues, D. R., Briggs, W. N., Duff, A. F., Chasser, K. M., Bottje, W. G., & Bielke, L. R. (2020). Impact of in ovo administered pioneer colonizers on intestinal proteome on day of hatch. Poultry Science, 99(3), 1254-1266. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2019.10.017
Zhang, H., Elliott, K. E. C., Durojaye, O. A., Fatemi, S. A., & Peebles, E. D. (2018). Effects of in ovo administration of L-ascorbic acid on broiler hatchability and its influence on the effects of pre-placement holding time on broiler quality characteristics. Poultry Science, 97(6), 1941-1947. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey040
Zou, Q., Fan, X., Xu, Y., Wang, T., & Li, D. (2022). Effects of dietary supplementation probiotic complex on growth performance, blood parameters, fecal harmful gas, and fecal microbiota in AA+ male broilers. Frontiers in Microbiology, 13, 1088179. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1088179